We’re at the end of another week, which means a new roundup. This week: sexual harassment in schools and work, some (unsurprisingly) ridiculous comments from Rush Limbaugh, Michigan’s anti-bullying law, more on women and mentors, and some new developments in the race for the next president of Egypt.
This week, the American Association of University Women (AAUW) released a new report on sexual harassment in schools, titled “Crossing the Line.” Their research reveals some disturbing revelations: like nearly half of students in grades 7 - 12 reported being subjected to some form of sexual harassment in the 2010-11 school year and just a fraction of incidents of sexual harassment are reported to an adult. And with the on-going allegations against certain prominent public figures and the attempts to dismantle the credibility of alleged victims, is anyone really surprised that the reports of sexual harassment in school is so low? It’s enough of a problem that women and men are being harassed in the workplace. It is perhaps more disturbing to hear that in middle and high schools “the most common [type of harassment] was unwelcome sexual comments, gestures or jokes, which was experienced by 46 percent of girls and 22 percent of boys.” Sometimes we don’t think of kids this way, or don’t think they’re capable of things like these. AAUW’s report shows otherwise.
On November 15, AAUW will host a panel discussion on sexual harassment and their new report at the National Press Club in Washington, DC. For more information on the event, click here. You can read the full report here. AAUW has also put together a compilation of blog posts related to the report, which you can read here.
This brings me to my next item – here’s some groan-worthy news: this is a clip that I can describe as nothing short of repulsive from Rush Limbaugh’s radio show this week. He was discussing the women accusing Republican Presidential candidate Herman Cain of sexual harassment and the possibility of some speaking out together. In a moment of overwhelming refinement [please note: read last statement with intense sarcasm], Rush asks, “What’s the big deal with the panel here? Do they want to synchronize their menstrual periods? Why appear together?”
Oh, Rush. It’s going to take more than sitting on a panel at a press conference for these women to synchronize their periods. Trust me. I lived in a sorority house with 32 other young women for a year and a half, and contrary to popular belief, we were not all synched up. Maybe it’s because they’re looking to feel more confident standing up to people like you who belittle them and to support each other? (That’s something I learned in part from being in a sorority, Rush: women are good at supporting each other. And when tested, we will.)
Sadly, I’ve got some more groan-worthy news this week: Michigan recently passed an anti-bullying law. But wait, there’s more! At the last minute, the clause “prohibit[ing] expression of religious or moral viewpoints” from being defined as “bullying” was added. Many lawmakers in Michigan fear that this could mean LGBTQ students could be bullied for their sexual orientation and the clause could “be used to exempt a student who tells a gay classmate he is going to go to hell.”
Kevin Epling, the father of the young man for whom this law was named, was dismayed to see the bill altered in this way. He took to his Facebook page to say, “I am ashamed that this could be Michigan’s bill on anti-bullying. For years the line [from Republicans] has been ‘no protected classes,’ and the first thing they throw in…was a very protected class, and limited them from repercussions of their own actions.”
In 2002, his son Matt was the victim of a hazing assault. Four days later, Matt killed himself. Over on the People For The American Way’s blog, they feature a video of Michigan State Senator Gretchen Whitmer speaking out against the changes to this bill – it’s worth watching.
A few weeks ago we learned that nearly one in five women has never had a mentor, despite widely held beliefs that having one is important. Over at Jezebel, they took a look at the lack of female mentors on TV and in books and movies. While they note that there are some examples of women mentoring women out there, it seems that a “woman's mentor is normally a male, either gay or a potential love-interest.” Is it wrong for men to mentor women? Certainly not. But would it be nice for more women to mentor women, and for young women to seek out women established in their careers as mentors? Yes. Women are still up against some frustrating odds in the workplace these days and it might be beneficial to all of us women to seek a strong female mentor to help guide us. Seeing examples like these in modern media would help.
And lastly, here’s something a bit more hopeful: Egypt has its first female candidate for president. 49-year-old Bothaina Kamel, a woman who was critical of Hosni Mubarak’s regime, has entered the race, saying she wants to “show the world that Egypt is a modern country, in which women are afforded the right to vie for the highest positions of state, which – like the right to vote – is a basic human right.” Kamel will likely face resistance from groups who do not believe it is acceptable to have a female head of state. However, Kamel is not letting this stop her. She says, “I’m fully aware of the patriarchal nature of Egyptian society. But I believe I’m capable of leading the country’s more than 80 million people; of leading a county of Egypt’s longstanding political and cultural weight.”
The timing of the election still remains unclear; Egypt’s first parliamentary races since Mubarak was overthrown will take place next month and officials are determined to hold the presidential race by 2013.
Anything you’ve seen this week that you want to share? Remember to leave a link in the comments!
Articles by Topic
Join the New Reproductive Health Campaign
Go to ThisIsPersonal.org to get the facts and tools you need to help protect women's reproductive health.






Comments
Male violence against women
Call it what it is—Male violence against women
by Elaine Charkowski
Breaking the silence by naming an atrocity ¬- and its perpetrators - is the first step toward ending it.
Patriarchy is a 6,000 year-old, male-supremacist social system. To maintain it, "Women's agony at the hands of men must never be revealed. If women steadfastly and courageously began to tell the truth and would not stop, would not be co-opted, would not become afraid, the truth of our enslavement would be undeniable and the jig would be up,” said Sonia Johnson in her book "Telling the Truth.”
Male violence against women must be named specifically in order to isolate it so it can be eradicated. Women, who outnumber men, are the single largest group of oppressed humans on the planet. Men have oppressed women nonstop for the longest length of time of any oppressed group, roughly 6,000 years (“The Chalice and the Blade” by Riane Eisler).
A young woman once told me that dealing with male violence "was just part of being a woman!” However, it's the moral responsibility of the group holding the most power to keep its members from oppressing people in groups holding less power.
Thus, all men are responsible for stopping male violence against women. Violent men must stop assaulting women. Non-violent men must not sit by and allow male violence against women to continue. To do so is to condone it. Their inaction-or indifference-is passive male violence against women.
Silence is complicity.
Here are some popular evasions often used to avoid naming male violence specifically and to avoid holding all men responsible for ending male violence against women:
1. "Not all men are violent"
No one said they were. Since men collectively hold more power than women, and since all men benefit from living in a sexist, male supremacist society, non-violent men are also responsible for stopping male violence against women.
In the same way, whites, who collectively hold more power than people of color (in the U.S.) are responsible for ending racism, even whites who don’t commit racist acts. This is because all whites benefit from living in a racist society that gives whites unearned advantages.
2. "Women are violent too"
Two wrongs don't make a right. Mary Daly calls this “universalism.” Muddying the waters, it blurs the specific focus on male violence against women by blending it with violence in general (universal violence) and casting it as a gender-neutral human issue (see examples of universalism in excuse #3 below).
Also, under patriarchy, women are blamed for their own degradation (being violent, collaborating with men against women, etc.) As Mary Daly wrote in her book “Pure Lust, (p.365) "Within the Virulent State of phallocracy, women have been attacked and divided against our Selves. From the earliest times of the patriarchy, countless mothers have been broken and the resulting broken daughters have carried on the chain of fragmentation. . . .
“They have been reduced to responding to the fettered/fathered urge to reproduce their altered–(that is, patriarchally identified selves)– in an endless circle of Self destruction. Such forcibly altered women have appeared to be normal within the man made milieu."
Although it exists, female violence pales in comparison to male violence. Men commit 88 percent of violent crime (US Bureau of Justice statistics). Women don't build rape camps to torture and molest men to death. Women don't control the U.S. government which spends more than half a trillion dollars a year on mass murder (war). Globally, women can't walk alone without the possibility of men assaulting them. The reverse is not true.
Even though some broken token women may collaborate with patriarchal men to gain power (Condi Rice, Margaret Thatcher etc.) it doesn't change the fact that patriarchal men are in charge and allow selected token "honorary men" into the boys club–if they identify with, and behave like, patriarchal men.
3. “Since violence is a human problem committed by both sexes, and since women also commit violence against women, male violence against women doesn’t have to be isolated and named specifically.”
Here are some examples of universalism (“women are violent too” etc.) The power disparity between women and men is the reason for some women’s dysfunctional behavior. It is not an excuse for it:
• “Some lesbians also batter their partners”
This results from internalized dysfunctional heterosexual behavior absorbed from a patriarchal society in which the dominating partner (the man) batters the woman. Male violence against women is the blueprint for lesbian vs lesbian battering.
•“Some women also commit racist violence against women”
Racism (male violence based on race) was created and implemented by dysfunctional men to “divide and conquer.” Male violence based on the “otherness” of the oppressed is the blueprint for racist attacks inflicted by some women upon “other” women. This results when women internalize racism and identify with the dominating race (including men)-instead of bonding with oppressed women. Racism is only possible when inflicted by the race possessing the most political and economic power (racism=prejudice+power over). Thus, women of dominated races cannot commit racism against women of the dominating race-only prejudice.
Male violence against women of the same race is clearly seen as sexism. However, male violence against women of different races is often obscured by being seen as just racism instead of racism and sexism.
•“Some women also exploit women sexually and economically
Hatred and contempt of women-including themselves-is the underlying issue. Women who exploit other women identify with and see themselves through the eyes of the oppressor (male supremacists who have contempt for women).
4. The absent referent
The "absent referent" refers to something without naming it. Mary Daly in her book “Quintessence” wrote, "Naming the agent is required for an adequate analysis of atrocities." As linguist Julia Penelope has shown in her book, “Speaking Freely: Unlearning the Lies of the Fathers' Tongues,” "agent deletion is a dangerous and common mind-muddying flaw."
Agent deletion is common, concerning male violence against women. Timid terms such as "sexual violence," "domestic violence" "gender-based violence," and "violence" refer to men without naming them, even when describing instances when it was obviously men who raped hundreds of thousands of women in Bosnia, Darfur, Rwanda and many other nations.
Even Amnesty International, which calls it "a global scourge," uses the term "violence against women" and “sexual violence” instead of "male violence against women." http://www.amnesty.org/en/campaigns/stop-violence-against-women.
5. "Men also rape men and boys."
Rape is a male hate crime against women. However, the use of universalism (see #3) attempts to portray rape as a gender-neutral atrocity. The fact that men also rape men and boys doesn’t change the fact that in every nation on earth, in all levels of society, men rape women. Even when men rape males, contempt for women is the underlying issue. Men rape males to degrade them by treating them like raped women.
If white supremacist men batter a black man, it’s clearly seen as a racist hate crime, even though white man also batter white men. In the same manner, rape is a hate crime against women, even though men also rape men.
6. "What we resist persists."
Sonia Johnson said this. Supposedly, opposing something directly "gives it more power." However this only works in some situations such as being attacked physically. Also, if racism and sexism were not opposed directly in the U.S., black people would still be enslaved. Women would still be men's property, unable to vote, own a business or keep their own wages. If the Nazis were not opposed directly, they would now run the world.
Opposing women's oppression directly is only one tactic. Another is using Sonia Johnson’s tactic of not confronting oppression directly in other situations where you aren’t under immediate threat of physical violence. This is done by being proactive by supporting women in their efforts to gain universal human rights. This can be done by volunteering at women’s shelters, donating to groups that help women in impoverished nations and many other ways. Both tactics are necessary.
7. The “passive voice”
In English grammar, using the passive voice (women were raped by men) instead of the active voice (men raped the women) shifts the focus from the perpetrators and their actions (men doing the raping) to their victims (the women being raped).
8. "Boys will be boys"
Patriarchal cultures promote "nature over nurture" (biological determinism) and claim men are "naturally violent." This legitimizes and perpetuates war and men's abuse of women. Abnormal violent "manhood" is regarded as the norm.
However, men are naturally peaceful. Archaeological evidence shows men enjoyed and maintained 1,500 years of peace in ancient Crete! It's proven today by famous non-violent men such as Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr. and many other men who organize against warfare and who speak out against male violence against women.
It takes years of traumatic conditioning (while being immersed in a violent society) to make men violent. "Military training camps, police academies and even some self-defense pros are constantly searching for more effective methods of suppressing the human revulsion to taking human life." - See "The Science of Creating Killers" http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/08/13/INGKFKDJHC1.DTL
If men were “naturally violent,” years of brutal conditioning by violent media and in boot camps would not be needed.
9. "Societies were always patriarchal and men have always dominated women"
Thousands of years of women's history has been nearly erased by patriarchal men. Marija Gimbutas, the world renowned archaeologist who wrote “Goddesses and Gods of Old Europe” unearthed many relics from around the world that proves men didn't always dominate women and that women and men once shared power in peaceful non-patriarchal Goddess worshipping. societies. Riane Eisler's book “The Chalice and the Blade” cites many more instances proving this.
“Democracy does not yet exist anywhere”
Robin Morgan wrote "The Demon Lover" which is a study of the link between terrorism in the home (domestic violence or more accurately, male violence against women in the home) and global terrorism. Terrorism, both in the home and the world, supports patriarchy and is a necessary component.
Morgan said, "The majority of the population in virtually all nation states is female and is forced by patriarchy to obey, be silent, and acquiesce-which means that ‘democracy' does not yet exist anywhere. What happens then when that majority refuses to obey?”
The necessary foundation for the creation of democracy is universal human rights for women. This can not be achieved unless global male violence against women is eradicated.
Men’s Resources
Men against sexual violence
http://menagainstsexualviolence.org/
Men against violence webring http://www.interactivetheatre.org/mav/
Amnesty International
http://web.amnesty.org/actforwomen/
Post new comment