Skip to contentNational Women's Law Center

Pregnant Worker Seeks Justice in Court

Asia Myers’ story is all too common. After suffering a threatened miscarriage, Asia brought her employer a doctor’s note with a lifting and pushing restriction. If Asia had been injured at her job, as a Certified Nursing Assistant at Hope Healthcare Center in Michigan, or if she had a medical condition other than pregnancy, this would have been no problem. With a doctor’s note, these other categories of employees were routinely given light duty assignments such as hair and nail care for residents, shaving residents, paperwork, feeding residents, and performing showering tasks that don’t require lifting.

But Asia was pregnant and Hope Healthcare Center maintains a discriminatory policy that denies pregnant employees reasonable accommodations that it permits for non-pregnant employees with similar restrictions. So when Asia asked for light duty, she was refused. Hope Healthcare Center forced Asia to choose between a steady paycheck and a healthy pregnancy. When she chose her pregnancy she was required to take unpaid leave. She lost her health benefits and struggled to make ends meet at a time when she most needed healthcare and a steady paycheck.

Luckily, the National Women’s Law Center helped connect Asia with the ACLU, and last week, the ACLU filed a complaint in federal district court in Michigan on Asia’s behalf.

This should not have happened to Asia. Her employer’s actions violated both federal law and Michigan law. Under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978, which amended Title VII, employers are required to treat pregnant workers with restrictions the same as “other persons not so affected but similar in their ability or inability to work.” Michigan law is even more clear, requiring employers to treat pregnant employees the same as employees “not so affected but similar in ability or inability to work, without regard to the source of any condition affecting the other individual’s ability or inability to work.”

It’s no accident that Michigan law adds that extra language about the source of the condition. Back in 2009, that language was added in order to make unmistakably clear that the law provided a solution to the problem that Asia faced—an employer that accommodates other medical conditions, including on-the-job injuries, but protest that such accommodations are impossible when employees need them because of pregnancy. How do we know? One of us helped draft that bill—and frankly, coming up with clarifying language was hard, since the Pregnancy Discrimination Act provision that Michigan law previously echoed seems pretty clear itself. Employers have to treat pregnant workers as well as they treat those similar in ability or inability to work. If her employer had taken that requirement seriously, it would have made all the difference for Asia Myers.

Comments

Great blog and I love what

Great blog and I love what you have said on this topic coco palms | Rivertrees | the rise @ oxley residences | rise @ oxley | Pollen and Bleu | and I think I will tweet this out to my friends so they can check it out as well.

jadwal nonton tv di nobartv.com

Jadwal acara Nonton TV Bola Online NOBARTV sepak bola di NOBARTV
Informasi kabar Berita Bola Terbaru NOBARTV di NOBARTV
Kumpulan Jadwal Pertandingan Sepak Bola Online Index Jadwal Bola Online Hari Ini NOBARTV di NOBARTV
Kumpulan Kabar Harian Berita Sepak Bola Online Index Berita Bola Online Terbaru NOBARTV di NOBARTV

Pregnant Fairness Act

I work as an EMT. I found out that I was pregnant on Christmas eve. I told my boss on the 26th that I was pregnant and I was suppose to have worked the 29th-30th and he had found someone else to work my forty-eight hr. shift. I got a doctor's appt. on the 31st, he gave me a doctor's note that I wasn't to lift over 40lbs. dead weight without lift assist. I brought it to my boss and he said that I wasn't able to work and that he was going to put the doctors excuse in my file. I asked him about PR events and he said that I wasn't able to do that either cause of the lifting restrictions. I asked him about working as a dispatcher and he told me that, he didn't need any more dispatchers. He has only four dispatchers and two bases open where I live. I got a letter from him stating that I was being put on suspension because I couldn't perform my duties because of the lifting restrictions, until the doctor releases me. I would like some help with this. I live in Poplar Bluff, MO if anyone can give me some advice or help I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks.

Pregnant workers fairness act

I am currently 7 months pregnant I work at presbyterian senior care in oakmont pa like asia myers story I also am a cna my dr gave light duty papers my work will not honor them and has been working us short and giving me all the heavy lifts and extra work physicaly I am braking down am I protected from with this law if so how do I exercise my right I fear they are trying to brake me down so I will quite.

Post new comment