Skip to contentNational Women's Law Center

Womenstake, NWLC's Blog

Answers to the Family Tax Credits Questions You Didn’t Even Know You Had

Posted by Amy Qualliotine, Outreach Associate | Posted on: March 05, 2013 at 04:42 pm

This post is the third in a series of weekly posts containing tax information and filing tips. Check back next week for our next post, or click here to read past posts.

Read more... Add new comment

Good News for 17 Million Women: Fair Minimum Wage Act To Be Introduced Today

Posted by Julie Vogtman, Senior Counsel | Posted on: March 05, 2013 at 12:40 pm

I write an awful lot about why it’s so important for women to raise the federal minimum wage, so I’m especially excited to head to Capitol Hill today for a press conference on the Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2013, which Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) and Representative George Miller (D-CA) will introduce at noon. Introducing this crucial legislation is an essential first step towards fairer pay for millions of women across the country.

The Fair Minimum Wage Act would gradually raise the minimum wage from $7.25 to $10.10 per hour, increase the minimum cash wage for tipped workers from $2.13 per hour to 70 percent of the regular minimum wage, and index these wages to keep up with inflation. Women especially stand to benefit from this proposal because they are about two-thirds of workers earning the federal minimum wage or less – and they are the majority of workers in the ten largest occupations that typically pay less than $10.10 per hour. As new analysis from NWLC shows, women are at least two-thirds of the workforce in seven of those ten occupations:

The 10 larges jobs that pay under $10.10/hour, by share of women

Women’s concentration in such low-wage jobs is one of the reasons we still see a large gap between women’s and men’s typical earnings: American women who work full time, year round are paid only 77 cents for every dollar paid to their male counterparts, and the wage gap is even wider for women of color.

Read more... Add new comment

Second Chances

Posted by Marcia D. Greenberger, Co-President | Posted on: March 05, 2013 at 11:51 am

We don’t always get a second chance to make things right. But tomorrow, obstructionists in the U.S. Senate do. In December 2011, every Republican Senator, save one (Senator Lisa Murkowski) filibustered the nomination of Caitlin Halligan to the important Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Tomorrow, the Senate will get a second chance to allow this outstanding nominee to receive an up-or-down vote.

The delays in her confirmation have only caused more problems for this court, and the public at large, during the thirteen months since the first vote to move to consider Caitlin Halligan’s nomination failed. Instead of three open seats on the D.C. Circuit, as there were in 2011, there are now four – making the D.C. Circuit the appellate court with the highest number of vacancies in the country. Now seven judges must do the work meant for a full eleven-judge court. With each vacancy, each judge’s caseload of complex, nationally important cases has grown.  What else has changed? Well, since President Obama won a second term, the virtual total shutdown of the confirmation process has ended. So now is clearly the time to move the Halligan nomination forward, to a consideration of her excellent record – and a confirmation vote.

Read more... Add new comment

Celebrate Women's History Month with More Diversity on The Federal Bench

Posted by Marcia D. Greenberger, Co-President | Posted on: March 04, 2013 at 11:40 am

March is Women's History Month, which affords us the opportunity to reflect on how far we've come in this country, and how far we have yet to go. And in many respects, recent events in the Congress illustrate both themes. For example, the last day of February, the Congress reauthorized the Violence Against Women Act, with even stronger protections for Native American, immigrant, and LGBT women. Yet it was a long and hard-fought battle, despite this law's proven effectiveness is combating domestic violence and the overwhelming bipartisan support the law has enjoyed over time.

Another example? Diversity on our federal courts. President Obama’s Administration has nominated more women and people of color for judgeships than any previous Administration in history. President Obama already has appointed more minority women judges than President Bush or President Clinton. As a result, the percentage of active women judges on the federal bench has increased from slightly above 25% to over 30% since 2009. For the first time in history, moreover, three women serve on the Supreme Court at one time. And of course, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, President Obama's first nominee to the Supreme Court, became the first Hispanic to sit on the highest court in the land.

Read more... Add new comment

Senate Judiciary Committee Holds Hearing on Jane Kelly

Posted by Cortelyou Kenney, Fellow | Posted on: March 04, 2013 at 10:25 am

On Wednesday, February 27, 2013, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on President Obama’s nomination of Jane Kelly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

Her credentials are stellar. A graduate summa cum laude from Duke University, she went on to graduate cum laude from Harvard Law School and clerk on the district court in South Dakota for Judge Donald Porter and on the Eighth Circuit for Judge David Hansen. Jane Kelly currently works as an assistant public defender in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and has briefed and argued numerous appellate cases, including before the Eighth Circuit, and tried 14 cases to verdict in federal district court. In 2004, she received the John Adams Award from the Iowa Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys, given annually to an Iowa attorney who has devoted his or her career to defending the indigent.

Read more... Add new comment

Behind the Scenes: Secretaries Duncan and Sebelius Champion Early Care and Learning

Posted by Alison Channon, Program Assistant | Posted on: March 01, 2013 at 04:50 pm

This morning I visited a Head Start classroom with NWLC’s Director of Child Care and Early Learning, Helen Blank, and two recognizable guests.

Helen was part of a select group of early childhood advocates invited to join Education Secretary Arne Duncan and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius as they visited the Judy Center at Rolling Terrace Elementary School in Takoma Park, Maryland. Judy Centers are located in or affiliated with elementary school across Maryland and provide a comprehensive set of services for at-risk children birth through age five and their families.

Secretaries Duncan and Sebelius treated the children to a great rendition of “Green Eggs and Ham” and I got to play press photographer. The children seemed to thoroughly enjoy their new storytellers though they were a bit skeptical when Secretary Sebelius tried to use the story to encourage them to try new foods.

Secretaries Duncan and Sebelius

“Have you ever tried a food you thought you wouldn’t like and then you liked it?” she asked.

“No,” a little boy responded matter-of-factly.

Read more... Add new comment

Former Judge Patricia M. Wald Brings Focus on D.C. Circuit Back to Where It Belongs: Justice

Posted by Amy K. Matsui, Senior Counsel and Director of Women and the Courts | Posted on: March 01, 2013 at 01:53 pm

Yesterday, the Washington Post published an op-ed by former D.C. Circuit Judge Patricia M. Wald. As Judge Wald put it, in short, “The D.C. Circuit has 11 judgeships but only seven active judges. There is cause for extreme concern that Congress is systematically denying the court the human resources it needs to carry out its weighty mandates.”

Read more... Add new comment

Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation Should Be Presumed Unconstitutional

Posted by Emily Martin, Vice President and General Counsel | Posted on: February 28, 2013 at 05:04 pm

For forty years, the Supreme Court has held that the government may not impose laws that treat men and women differently based on an ‘interest’ in perpetuating traditional gender roles. The Court should also hold that the government may not decide who is permitted to marry based on traditional gender stereotypes about who men and women should love, the National Women’s Law Center argued in an amicus brief filed today in Hollingsworth v. Perry—the case in which the Supreme Court will decide the constitutionality of Proposition 8, the California ballot measure that overturned the California Supreme Court's ruling that same-sex couples have a right to marry. Tomorrow, the Center will file the same brief in United States v. Windsor, the case before the Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of the provision of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) that bars the federal government from recognizing marriages of same-sex couples.

Read more... 1 comment