Skip to contentNational Women's Law Center

Womenstake, NWLC's Blog

Harmful Campus Sexual Harassment and Assault—Not a Free Speech Problem

Posted by Amelia Bell, Intern | Posted on: July 29, 2014 at 02:49 pm

Last Friday I had the opportunity to attend the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights’ briefing entitled “Enforcement of Sexual Harassment Policy at Educational Institutions by the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights and the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice.”

Read more... 1 comment

Marriage Equality Affirmed in the Fourth Circuit

Posted by Lauren Khouri, Fellow | Posted on: July 29, 2014 at 09:19 am

Yesterday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit handed down its decision in Bostic v. Rainey, becoming the second federal appeals court to strike down bans on marriage between same-sex couples post-Windsor.

Read more... 1 comment

Recap: The Schedules That Work Act Briefing, July 22nd

Posted by Therese Salazar, Intern | Posted on: July 28, 2014 at 10:55 am

The Schedules that Work Act was introduced in the House & Senate this past Tuesday, followed by a standing-room-only congressional briefing about why workers need fair work schedules.

Read more... 2 comments

The White House’s Champions of Change: A Call to Eliminate the Tipped Minimum Wage

Posted by Hana Bajramovic, Intern | Posted on: July 28, 2014 at 09:44 am

On Tuesday, July 22, the White House celebrated the Raise the Wage Champions of Change, a group of policymakers, workers, and business owners fighting for an increase in the minimum wage.

Read more... 1 comment

The Business Case For A Higher Minimum Wage

Posted by Tiffany Ray, Intern | Posted on: July 28, 2014 at 09:02 am

Opponents of raising the minimum wage say it’s a job killer that will cause businesses to fail and reduce employment overall.

Read more... 1 comment

Pam Harris Nomination Moves Forward in Senate

Posted by Amy K. Matsui, Senior Counsel and Director of Women and the Courts | Posted on: July 25, 2014 at 11:45 am

Yesterday, the Senate voted to move forward on the nomination of Pamela Harris to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. A confirmation vote is scheduled for 5:30 pm on Monday.

Read more... 1 comment

Too Much At Risk: Ryan Poverty Plan Puts Children Needing Early Learning at Risk

Posted by Helen Blank, Director of Child Care and Early Learning | Posted on: July 25, 2014 at 08:44 am

Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) released his plan to combat poverty this morning. It flies in the face of the strong support that the public has expressed for increasing investments in early learning.

Read more... 2 comments

Play it Again… No, Don’t: Ryan Poverty Plan Sticks to Theme of Consolidating Programs, No New Funding

Posted by Emily Wales, Fellow | Posted on: July 24, 2014 at 04:08 pm

Rep. Paul Ryan’s new plan [PDF] to fight poverty is out, and I’ll give him this: He’s staying the course. Not a course that works, mind you, but Ryan’s proposal sticks with a predictable path of – wait for it – block grants with little federal regulation, no new funding, elimination of some critical programs, and complaints that safety net programs discourage low-income families from working.

A new era? More like a blast from the past.

Ryan’s proposal states that it’s not about budget-cutting, and it “does not make judgments about an optimal level of spending.” Instead, he argues, this is about finding new ways to alleviate poverty. That’s hard to take seriously from someone who, as chairman of the House Budget Committee, has proposed past budgets that would deeply cut safety net programs. (Even the conservative National Review noted that Ryan’s budget proposals would go too far in cutting programs for low-income families: “But balancing the budget like Ryan did last time around . . . means cutting programs rather than fixing them or replacing them with wholly new ones that will better accomplish their goals.”) With this new poverty plan, Ryan seems to think you can have it both ways – draw up one plan to cut programs and another that ignores your plans to cut. Confusing, eh?

Read more... 1 comment