Skip to contentNational Women's Law Center

Womenstake, NWLC's Blog

Happy Anniversary, Title IX

Posted by Katherine Protil, Intern | Posted on: June 26, 2015 at 03:04 pm

On a hot Tuesday afternoon, social justice advocates gathered in the Russell Senate building in D.C. to pop champagne, munch on cupcakes, and celebrate the 43rd anniversary of the passage of Title IX.

Read more... Add new comment

Another Strong Ruling for Birth Control Coverage

Posted by Margot Benedict, Legal Intern | Posted on: June 26, 2015 at 09:47 am

Two is company, three is a crowd, and four, well, four is great news for the birth control coverage requirement. On Monday, the Fifth Circuit became the fourth appeals court to reject non-profits’ challenges to the accommodation in the birth control requirement of the Affordable Care Act.

What the Accommodation Is

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) includes a provision that requires insurance plans to cover birth control alongside a range of other preventive services, without co-payments or deductibles. The accommodation allows a non-profit organization with religious objections to birth control to exclude it from its insurance plan. The non-profit must notify its insurance plan or the federal government of its objections, so that women who work for objecting employers get birth control coverage directly from the insurance company.

Read more... Add new comment

Now There's Really No Excuse: Pass the PWFA!

Posted by Abigail Bar-Lev, Fellow | Posted on: June 24, 2015 at 03:06 pm

Today is not just any old Wednesday. In fact, let’s rename it “Bipartisan Wednesday.” Or, “We All Stand for Pregnant Workers Wednesday.” Or, “The Day the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act Gained a Republican Sponsor in the House (So There’s Really No Excuse Not to Pass It) Wednesday.”

What’s the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act?

Read more... Add new comment

Vance v. BSU Anniversary: A Case of the Terrible Twos

Posted by Adaku Onyeka-Crawford, Fellow | Posted on: June 24, 2015 at 02:52 pm

There’s more than corn in Indiana. There’s also Ball State University, home of my alma mater high school and defendant-appellee in the terrible Supreme Court decision Vance v. Ball State University, which “celebrates” its second anniversary today.

In that decision, a bare majority of the Court weakened protections against workplace harassment. Let me explain. In 1998, the Court recognized that employers have an extra duty to make sure supervisors in the workplace do not harass their subordinates. That’s because supervisors can abuse their employer-granted power to create or maintain a hostile environment. After all, it’s hard to tell your harasser to “beat it” or report him or her, if you know that person can make you work in unsafe conditions, deny overtime or time off requests, or fire you.

Read more... Add new comment

Girls, Sports, and Equality: A State-by-State Ranking on Title IX

Public high schools across the country are not providing girls with their fair share of spots on sports teams—and today, on the 43rd anniversary of Title IX, we released a new analysis that shows every state is falling short. The analysis features an interactive map and a state-by-state ranking based on the percentage of high schools in each state and the District of Columbia that have large gender equity gaps in sports participation.*

Using the latest Department of Education Civil Rights Data Collection for the 2011-2012 school year we find that:

Read more... Add new comment

Yes, Child Care Needs Reform — And Funding

Posted by Emma Holland, Intern | Posted on: June 19, 2015 at 10:37 am

On Wednesday, the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services and Education marked up a bill that would include major cuts to programs that are critical to women and their families. The Child Care Development Block Grant (CCDBG) escaped without being cut—but it already falls short of meeting families’ needs. Moreover, the bill provides no new funding to meet the important goals of child care legislation passed with overwhelming bipartisan support just last November.

Resources Don’t Match Goals

Read more... Add new comment

Defense Bill Ignores Servicewomen's Constitutional Rights

Posted by Erika Hanson, Legal Intern | Posted on: June 19, 2015 at 10:28 am

Servicewomen have committed their lives to the defense of our Constitution, but our own government is denying them their constitutionally guaranteed rights. Servicewomen and dependents of servicemembers are currently prohibited from receiving abortion care at military hospitals except in cases where the woman’s life is endangered or the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest. Practically, this law could mean that a servicewoman is unable to get an abortion.

Some members of Congress tried to restore our brave servicewomen’s constitutional rights. Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) introduced an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act that would have repealed this unfair ban. Disappointingly, Senator Shaheen’s amendment did not get a floor vote.

The Current Ban Denies Servicewomen and Dependents of Servicemembers the Care They Need

Read more... Add new comment

New York Assembly Agrees, It's Not Your Boss' Business

Posted by Rachel Easter, Fellow | Posted on: June 18, 2015 at 01:57 pm

There’s this pretty obvious concept that your medical decisions should be between you and your medical provider. For some reason, not everyone agrees. Too often, bosses think that they should have a say in their employees’ reproductive decisions. Specifically, bosses across the country have fired or docked their employees’ pay, because they disagree with their employee’s personal reproductive health care decisions. 

D.C. has stepped up and put an end to this type of discrimination, at least for now. The New York Assembly is trying to do the same. Yesterday, the Assembly voted on and passed AB 1142, known as “the Boss Bill.” This bill says bosses cannot discriminate against employees because of their reproductive health decisions. Now, the Boss Bill moves to the Senate for consideration.

Read more... Add new comment