Skip to contentNational Women's Law Center

Amy K. Matsui, Senior Counsel and Director of Women and the Courts

Amy K. Matsui is Senior Counsel and Director of Women and the Courts at the National Women’s Law Center. She works on economic issues affecting low- and moderate-income women and families, with special emphasis on federal and state tax policy and women’s retirement security. Her work with retirement savings policy and federal and state tax credits for working families comprises policy analysis, federal advocacy, and public education and outreach. She also directs the Center's advocacy efforts around federal judicial nominations and diversity in the federal judiciary. Ms. Matsui has worked at the Center since 2002. Prior to joining the Center, Ms. Matsui practiced commercial law in the private sector. She clerked for the Honorable Carolyn Dineen King, then-Chief Judge of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, in 2000. She is a graduate of the University of California at Berkeley, and Stanford Law School.

My Take

Two Female Judges Confirmed, More Are Waiting

Posted by Amy K. Matsui, Senior Counsel and Director of Women and the Courts | Posted on: November 16, 2011 at 05:34 pm

Yesterday the Senate confirmed two women to federal district courts -- Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers to the Northern District of California and Sharon Gleason to the District of Alaska.

Read more...

Women Lawyers on President’s Staff

Posted by Amy K. Matsui, Senior Counsel and Director of Women and the Courts | Posted on: November 03, 2011 at 01:57 pm

Well, you don’t see a picture like this every day.  So it’s worth taking a minute to celebrate it – and read the article. And there’s one more. Since women have made up about half of law school classes for nearly twenty years, pictures like these are rarer than they should be.  Law firm partners? Courts? Law school faculty?  Whose picture will be next?

Read more...

Senate Confirms Stephen Higginson to Fifth Circuit: 15 Confirmations in October Leaves 22 (and soon to be 27) on the Floor

Posted by Amy K. Matsui, Senior Counsel and Director of Women and the Courts | Posted on: November 02, 2011 at 09:25 am

Monday, the Senate confirmed Stephen Higginson to a judicial emergency seat on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Louisiana, by a vote of 88-0.

Read more...

Senate Confirms Three More Judges - Whee!

Posted by Amy K. Matsui, Senior Counsel and Director of Women and the Courts | Posted on: October 20, 2011 at 10:44 am

On the heels of its confirmation of Cathy Bissoon Monday, the Senate yesterday confirmed two judges to Pennsylvania district courts — Mark Hornak to the Western District of Pennsylvania and Robert Mariani to the Middle District of Pennsylvania — as well as  Robert N. Scola, Jr., to the Southern District of Florida. This brings the number of judges confirmed so far in October to 14 and the number of vacancies down to 85. How can the Senate top its performance this week? Well, for its next trick, how about voting on the 23 remaining nominees before the end of the month?

Read more...

Romney Advisor Robert Bork: The Equal Protection Clause Doesn’t Protect Against Sex Discrimination, Which Doesn’t Exist Anyway

Posted by Amy K. Matsui, Senior Counsel and Director of Women and the Courts | Posted on: October 19, 2011 at 01:43 pm

Law professor Robert Bork has signed on as co-chairman of GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s “Justice Advisory Committee.” According to Bork, a former federal judge and failed Supreme Court nominee, “I’d like to be asked a question now and then for advice.”

So, what kind of advice will Bork, known for his staunchly outlier positions, offer? Well, in addition to his opposition to the constitutional right to privacy and his very limited view of the protection of the First Amendment, Bork takes an extreme stance on the Fourteenth Amendment: he believes the Equal Protection Clause should not apply to women. (Even Justice Scalia recently walked back a similar view.) As Bork explained to Newsweek:

“I think I feel justified [in taking that position] by the fact ever since [the Court held that it applies to women], the Equal Protection Clause kept expanding in ways that cannot be justified historically, grammatically, or any other way. Women are a majority of the population now—a majority in university classrooms and a majority in all kinds of contexts. It seems to me silly to say, ‘Gee, they’re discriminated against and we need to do something about it.’ They aren’t discriminated against anymore.”

Read more...