Skip to contentNational Women's Law Center

Amy K. Matsui, Senior Counsel and Director of Women and the Courts

Amy K. Matsui is Senior Counsel and Director of Women and the Courts at the National Women’s Law Center. She works on economic issues affecting low- and moderate-income women and families, with special emphasis on federal and state tax policy and women’s retirement security. Her work with retirement savings policy and federal and state tax credits for working families comprises policy analysis, federal advocacy, and public education and outreach. She also directs the Center's advocacy efforts around federal judicial nominations and diversity in the federal judiciary. Ms. Matsui has worked at the Center since 2002. Prior to joining the Center, Ms. Matsui practiced commercial law in the private sector. She clerked for the Honorable Carolyn Dineen King, then-Chief Judge of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, in 2000. She is a graduate of the University of California at Berkeley, and Stanford Law School.

My Take

A Tax Refund Time Machine?

Posted by Amy K. Matsui, Senior Counsel and Director of Women and the Courts | Posted on: February 19, 2013 at 12:51 pm

This post is the first in a series of weekly posts containing tax information and filing tips. Check back next week for our next post, or click here to read past posts.

It’s February, which means tax season is in full swing (even if you are in denial). For those who haven’t yet filed their 2012 taxes, I offer an item for your consideration prior to the April 15 deadline. Even those families who have already filed their tax returns for the last tax year (and hopefully claimed tax credits for which they were eligible) shouldn’t stop reading here.

April 15 isn’t just the deadline for filing your 2012 tax return without an extension. It’s the deadline for filing past tax returns! Specifically, it is the deadline for the nearly one million individuals and families who failed to file a 2009 tax return. Practically speaking, this means you can go back in time three years and get a do-over on your taxes.

Read more...

Diversity of Obama's Judicial Nominees in the Spotlight - Again

We’ve said it before, and we’ll say it again: President Obama has made significant steps towards increasing the diversity of the federal judiciary in a number of important ways. 41% of Obama’s confirmed judges have been women — raising the number of total female active federal judges to approximately 30% overall. At the end of President Obama’s first term alone, there have been more female, black, Hispanic, and openly gay federal judges than confirmed during President George W. Bush’s two terms.

This brings us to the recent nomination of the Jane Kelly, who, if confirmed, would be the second-ever woman to serve on the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. An article this morning that described one case recently decided by the Eighth Circuit is illustrative of how diversity matters to outcomes of actual cases that are decided and women contribute to the quality of justice. The article quotes the Executive Director of the Infinity Project, who describes the case of Shawanna Nelson, an Arkansas prisoner who filed a lawsuit over being shackled to a hospital bed while in labor.

Read more...

Jane Kelly Nominated to be Second Woman (Ever) on Eighth Circuit

Posted by Amy K. Matsui, Senior Counsel and Director of Women and the Courts | Posted on: February 01, 2013 at 12:34 pm

Yesterday, President Obama nominated Jane Kelly to a seat on the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. If confirmed, Ms. Kelly would join Judge Diana Murphy as the second female judge – ever – on the Eighth Circuit. And Judge Murphy, to date the first and only, wasn’t confirmed to the Eighth Circuit until 1994! But I digress.

Read more...

Two More Confirmations This Week; Only 18 More to Go

Posted by Amy K. Matsui, Senior Counsel and Director of Women and the Courts | Posted on: December 13, 2012 at 01:30 pm

Tuesday, two more federal district court judges, John Dowdell (Northern District of Oklahoma) and Jesus Bernal (Central District of California) were confirmed by the Senate. This follows on the heels of confirmation votes on four district court judges last week, and, potentially one or more votes this afternoon. Although some commentators have characterized these votes as progress, which I suppose it would be as a relative matter, it's important not to forget the Senate minority's blockade of confirmation votes in the months preceding the election: for example, Senate Minority Leader McConnell announced in mid-June that no more circuit court nominees would receive a vote until after the elections, and backed it up with a filibuster of the nominee to an Oklahoma seat on the 10th circuit in July. Further, Senate Republicans only allowed votes on three district court nominees in September. And it's not as though the votes were coming fast and furious before June.

Read more...

Look At How Easy This Can Be: Another Three Judges Confirmed

Posted by Amy K. Matsui, Senior Counsel and Director of Women and the Courts | Posted on: December 07, 2012 at 10:33 am

Wednesday, the Senate confirmed Michael Shea to the District Court of Connecticut. He had been approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee and thus ready for a vote before the full Senate on April 26, 2012 – over seven months ago. So for seven months, the people of Connecticut have been contending with an overburdened federal court system while a minority of the Senate refused to allow a vote on now-Judge Shea’s nomination.

As an article in the Hartford Courant detailed, “Two of Connecticut's eight federal judgeships are vacant and some of a half-dozen or so semi-retired senior judges two of whom are 88 years old carry substantial caseloads.” The article went on to note that “The shortage in Connecticut has not been classified an emergency. But federal litigants in the state now depend on jurists from states such as Arkansas, South Dakota and Montana to preside over scores of their civil trials.”

Read more...