Skip to contentNational Women's Law Center

Brigette Courtot, Senior Health Policy Analyst

Brigette Courtot is the Senior Policy Analyst for Health and Reproductive Rights at the National Women's Law Center, where she focuses on women's access to health coverage, implementation of the federal health reform law, and how various public policies affect women's health outcomes. Prior to joining NWLC, she worked as a Research Associate in the Health Policy Center at the Urban Institute, where she conducted maternal and child health services research with an emphasis on access to care for underserved populations. She holds a Master of Public Health degree from the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health and a bachelor's degree from Northwestern University.

My Take

Some Health Choices That Women Could Do Without

Posted by Brigette Courtot, Senior Health Policy Analyst | Posted on: September 08, 2009 at 04:00 pm

by Brigette Courtot, Policy Analyst, 
National Women's Law Center  

This post is part of a series on Women and Health Reform.

NWLC’s health and reproductive rights team does a lot of work around the importance of choice.  We advocate for reproductive choice, so that women can make important life decisions about whether and when to have children. We support choice in childbirth, because we believe that women and their families should be able to have a safe out-of-hospital birth if they so choose. And in our priorities for national health reform, we emphasize choice between public and private health insurance options, since women will benefit from the transparency, security, and competition that a public health insurance option promises. We support these choices because they promote a woman’s wellbeing.

But not all choices in health care are good.  When women can’t afford the health care they need, they are faced with choices that they’d be better off without.  In 2007, more than half of all women in the United States reported problems getting necessary health care because of cost.  They had a difficult choice between their own health care and other financial obligations, and the “other” won out.  Given the many responsibilities that women juggle every day, is this any surprise?  Imagine a young woman choosing between filling a prescription and making a student loan payment.  Or a mother choosing between a follow-up doctor’s visit and buying school supplies for her children.   Or a retiree choosing between a mammogram or paying this month’s electricity bill.  In a country with so many resources, that already spends so much on health care per capita, women should never have to make these sorts of choices. 

Read more...

Stop Rewarding "Macho Men": Ban Gender Rating in Health Insurance

Posted by Brigette Courtot, Senior Health Policy Analyst | Posted on: August 18, 2009 at 07:18 pm

by Brigette Courtot, Policy Analyst, 
National Women's Law Center 

This post is part of a series on Women and Health Reform.

Read more...

Young, Uninsured, and Ready for Reform

Posted by Brigette Courtot, Senior Health Policy Analyst | Posted on: August 10, 2009 at 01:45 pm

by Brigette Courtot, Policy Analyst, 
National Women’s Law Center 

This post is part of a series on Women and Health Reform.

Read more...

Failure to Protect? Yep, That's the Individual Market We Know

Posted by Brigette Courtot, Senior Health Policy Analyst | Posted on: July 22, 2009 at 08:04 pm

by Brigette Courtot, Policy Analyst, 
National Women's Law Center 

This post is part of a series on Women and Health Reform.

If you’re looking for more evidence that the individual health insurance market (that unwelcoming place where people buy coverage directly from insurance companies) is failing us in pretty much every way possible, add this new brief from the Commonwealth Fund to the pile. Aptly titled “Failure to Protect,” it uses findings from a 2007 survey to illustrate why the individual insurance market is anything but a reliable source for comprehensive and affordable health coverage. Consider these findings:

  • Most adults who shopped for coverage in the individual market found it very difficult or impossible to find a plan that fit their needs—they were either denied due to a preexisting health condition or were offered a plan that was too expensive or that didn’t cover the care they needed.  The majority (73%) never ended up buying a plan.
  • Adults who do purchase individual market plans spend considerably more on health care than those with employer-sponsored insurance (ESI); 51% of people with individual market coverage spent 10% of their income or more on out-of-pocket costs (all medical expenses, premiums, and prescription drugs), compared to 29% of those with ESI. Median spending for those with individual market coverage was more than twice that for people with ESI ($6,750 vs. $2,250).  
  • Those with individual market plans also report higher rates of problems with their coverage (e.g. dollar or visit limits on covered services, or expensive medical bills that aren’t covered by their plan) and are more likely to avoid or delay needed care because of cost.
Read more...

Health Reform Can't Come Soon Enough: New Findings on Medical Bankruptcy

Posted by Brigette Courtot, Senior Health Policy Analyst | Posted on: June 08, 2009 at 07:55 pm

by Brigette Courtot, Policy Analyst, 
National Women's Law Center 

This post is part of a series on Women and Health Reform.

Read more...