Skip to contentNational Women's Law Center

Brigette Courtot, Senior Health Policy Analyst

Brigette Courtot is the Senior Policy Analyst for Health and Reproductive Rights at the National Women's Law Center, where she focuses on women's access to health coverage, implementation of the federal health reform law, and how various public policies affect women's health outcomes. Prior to joining NWLC, she worked as a Research Associate in the Health Policy Center at the Urban Institute, where she conducted maternal and child health services research with an emphasis on access to care for underserved populations. She holds a Master of Public Health degree from the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health and a bachelor's degree from Northwestern University.

My Take

Health Care Interrupted

Posted by Brigette Courtot, Senior Health Policy Analyst | Posted on: December 19, 2008 at 02:12 pm

by Brigette Courtot, Policy Analyst
National Women's Law Center
 
This post is part of a series on Women and Health Reform.

With our economy in shambles, states are facing their worst budget deficits in decades.  Earlier this week, the National Governor’s Association announced that collectively, states may need to close a budget gap of at least $200 billion over the next two years. Since nearly every state must, by law, balance its budget each year, enormous shortfalls represent tough decisions—which programs and services will take the hit?
 
Public health insurance programs are often on the chopping block when states face fiscal pressure, including the Medicaid programs (jointly funded by federal and state governments) that provide essential health coverage for millions of poor women.  At least 19 states have proposed or already enacted cuts to public coverage programs for the current or next fiscal years, with plans ranging from the elimination of coverage for pregnant women to substantial premium increases for poor children.  These cuts come precisely when there is the greatest need for public health insurance, as increasing numbers of people qualify for public coverage after experiencing job loss, foreclosures, and other negative effects of the failing economy.
 
No one could envy the position of the state policymakers who are making these types of tough decisions, but when it comes to health care, short-sighted cuts may not even benefit state budgets. Public coverage cuts mean that millions of people will find it more difficult or even impossible to get necessary health care.  And more people with unmet health needs now equals more complicated and costly health conditions later.  
 

Read more...

No Health Reform? It’s Gonna Cost Ya!

Posted by Brigette Courtot, Senior Health Policy Analyst | Posted on: November 20, 2008 at 09:17 pm

by Brigette Courtot, Policy Analyst
National Women’s Law Center

Reading the New America Foundation’s new report “The Cost of Doing Nothing: Why the Cost of Failing to Fix Our Health System is Greater than the Cost of Reform,” prompted a guilty memory for me. It involved my very first car, a little-known domestic model that had seen better days but which I loved nonetheless because it was mine. As much as I loved this car, one might think that I would have heeded the advice of my elders, who encouraged regular oil changes and close attention to strange noises under the hood. But I was 16 and not very interested in advice—I did next to nothing to fix or maintain my little car and eventually suffered the consequences. When it finally died on me, the estimated repairs were too expensive and I couldn’t keep the car.

The compelling argument put forth by the authors of “The Cost of Doing Nothing,” can easily be applied to my teenaged vehicular neglect. Sometimes it costs far more to do nothing than to make the changes that are necessary for improvement.  When it comes to our dysfunctional health care system, eschewing comprehensive reform and maintaining the status quo is the equivalent of running an old car into the ground.  If we don’t pursue a major fix for the problems that plague the United States health system, things will only get worse.  Consider these frightening statistics from the report:

  • By 2016, the average cost of job-based family health coverage will climb to over $24,000 a year (that’s more than 45 percent of the median household income)

  • In 2007, the economy lost as much as $207 billion because of the poor health and shorter lifespan of the uninsured (by most estimates, this amount of money could adequately cover the uninsured)

Read more...

"Pricey and Precarious": Yep, That’s the Individual Health Insurance Market

Posted by Brigette Courtot, Senior Health Policy Analyst | Posted on: October 23, 2008 at 07:14 pm

by Brigette Courtot, Policy Analyst
National Women’s Law Center

This post is part of a weekly series on Women and Health Reform.

Read more...

The Shameful Link between Health and Wealth

Posted by Brigette Courtot, Senior Health Policy Analyst | Posted on: October 15, 2008 at 02:14 pm

by Brigette Courtot, Policy Analyst
and Golda Philip, Health Fellow
National Women's Law Center

Today, a woman earns 77 cents for every dollar that a man earns. This wage gap is distressing in and of itself, but it becomes even more significant when you consider that a woman’s relative poverty could be a matter of life or death. Simply put, those with the fewest resources in this country are also the least likely to have access to high-quality health care. Not surprisingly, lower-income women experience poorer health outcomes, many of which could be prevented through access to high-quality care.

Insurance coverage is a major factor in the health inequities that poor families experience.  The relationship between access to health care and access to health insurance is well-documented, and women who are poor or near-poor are at greatest risk for being uninsured. While public health insurance programs play a critical role in extending coverage to many low-income women and their families (state Medicaid programs, for instance particular, cover more than 20 million women), there are millions more who don’t qualify for public health insurance. Their income may exceed program limits (in nearly half of the states, even a working parent with an annual income of $12,000 earns too much to qualify for coverage) or they may not meet other stringent eligibility criteria. 

Read more...

Can We Afford NOT to Pursue Health Reform?

Posted by Brigette Courtot, Senior Health Policy Analyst | Posted on: October 09, 2008 at 08:51 pm

by Brigette Courtot, Policy Analyst
National Women’s Law Center

This post is part of a weekly series on Women and Health Reform.

As I settled into the back of a taxi headed to the Tampa airport on Tuesday, the cab driver—eyeing my plastic name badge and the brand new screen-printed tote bag on my lap—asked what had brought me to his city.  In the course of explaining the conference I’d just attended, I mentioned that my work involved health reform—“you know, changing the health system so that we all have good health insurance, and so that we all get high-quality health care.”

This was met with skepticism—“Sure, it sounds good.  But look at what is happening to our economy.  Can we afford to do these things you are talking about?”  He was right about one thing—the economy is going belly-up, and it seems to be taking American’s retirement funds, hopes of homeownership, and general peace-of-mind with it.  But his observation about health reform was off-target.  The question is not “Can we afford health reform?” but rather “Can we afford not to have health reform?”  Health reform isn’t just a wish-list item that we can save for another day; in fact, the problems that plague our health system contribute in a major way to the economic troubles that families are facing.  Nearly 1 in 3 Americans report a serious problem paying for health care and health insurance, according to a new Kaiser Family Foundation poll.  Similarly, our July poll found that a quarter of women are not at all confident that they will be able to cover health care costs for themselves and their families in the years ahead.  For low-income women, this proportion doubled, with half saying they weren’t confident at all in their ability to pay for health care.

Read more...