Skip to contentNational Women's Law Center

Brigette Courtot, Senior Health Policy Analyst

Brigette Courtot is the Senior Policy Analyst for Health and Reproductive Rights at the National Women's Law Center, where she focuses on women's access to health coverage, implementation of the federal health reform law, and how various public policies affect women's health outcomes. Prior to joining NWLC, she worked as a Research Associate in the Health Policy Center at the Urban Institute, where she conducted maternal and child health services research with an emphasis on access to care for underserved populations. She holds a Master of Public Health degree from the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health and a bachelor's degree from Northwestern University.

My Take

Mammograms That Won't Break the Bank

Posted by Brigette Courtot, Senior Health Policy Analyst | Posted on: May 29, 2008 at 08:13 pm

by Brigette Courtot, Policy Analyst
National Women’s Law Center

This post is part of a weekly series on Women and Health Reform.

Read more...

Check Out a Check-Up

Posted by Brigette Courtot, Senior Health Policy Analyst | Posted on: May 12, 2008 at 09:24 pm

by Brigette Courtot, Policy Analyst
National Women’s Law Center

This post is part of a daily series for National Women's Health Week. 

Today is National Women’s Health Check-Up Day, which kicks off National Women's Health Week (NWHW). According to the official website, this week-long observance of women’s health "empowers women across the country to get healthy by taking action."

It’s certainly important for a woman to see a health care provider regularly (providers usually suggest a yearly visit) so that she can be screened for conditions such as breast, cervical or colorectal cancer, diabetes, high blood pressure or cholesterol, and osteoporosis. Screening tests may help find these conditions early, when they are easier and less costly to treat. Getting to a health care provider for a check-up could save a woman’s life (the National Cancer Institute reports that as many as 35 percent of premature cancer deaths could have been avoided through screening) or prevent more serious health problems and disability in the future.

So, ladies, get a health check-up! Make sure that the women that you love get their health check-up!

Having said that, let’s put a twist on NWHW: it is not enough to encourage women to take action to protect and improve their health — we must also make sure that our federal and state policies protect and improve women’s health!

Read more...

Love. Health Insurance. Taxes.

Posted by Brigette Courtot, Senior Health Policy Analyst | Posted on: April 10, 2008 at 06:38 pm

by Brigette Courtot, Policy Analyst
National Women’s Law Center

This post is part of a weekly series on Women and Health Reform.

Oh, the things we do for love. Why else would I agree to sushi when I’d rather have Thai, tune into NPR’s “Car Talk” even though it bores me to tears, and get out of bed to investigate midnight noises that — as a heavy sleeper — I would normally snore straight through? I do these things because they are part and parcel of being in a committed relationship, and because they make the person that I love feel happy and safe. This makes sense, no?

Our current health insurance system recognizes — and even promotes — this desire to provide for and protect our loved ones in some important ways. First, most employers offer health insurance to their employees’ family members, as part of their overall compensation package. In addition, the employee doesn’t pay taxes on the health benefits that the employer gives their family members. For workers, this is a good deal all around — benefits for the people they care about, and no taxes. Still making sense, right?

Unless, of course, you aren’t married to that person that you love. Workers with unmarried domestic partners (whether same- or opposite-sex) can pretty much kiss that good deal goodbye. They should consider themselves lucky if their employer even offers health insurance coverage for their partner — about three out of four American employers don’t. If they beat those odds and are fortunate enough to work at a place that does offer partner benefits, they’ll find that (unlike their married co-workers) their loved one’s coverage is taxed as part of their income. Same committed relationship. Same health benefits. Unequal taxes. This is where things stop making sense.

Read more...

Pick Me! Pick Me! (I Could Really Use the Health Insurance…)

Posted by Brigette Courtot, Senior Health Policy Analyst | Posted on: February 28, 2008 at 02:46 pm

by Brigette Courtot, Policy Analyst
National Women’s Law Center

Yesterday’s Powerball lottery prize was a cool $133 million. Like lots of other people dreaming of winning big, I bought my ticket. No surprise that I didn’t win—despite a penchant for random drawings, I’m just not very lucky when it comes to lottery games. It’s a good thing, then, that I’m not a poor and uninsured Oregonian. If I were, a chance in the lottery could be my best and only option for getting health insurance.

You see, Oregon has recently reopened enrollment for its Oregon Health Plan (OHP) Standard component – this is the state’s Medicaid program for poor adults who aren’t otherwise eligible for public coverage (pregnant women, very poor custodial parents, and disabled people are covered under a different component of Medicaid, called OHP Plus). This is the first time that enrollment has opened in nearly four years. I could write an entire blog post about the misfortunes of OHP Standard, but here it is in a nutshell: Like many states, Oregon faced a serious budget deficit in 2002 and OHP Standard went to the chopping block. In the years that followed, the program was a favorite target for budget cuts. The state increased fees for program enrollees, cut benefits (including prescription drugs, mental health and dental services), put strict rules in place about premium payments, and eventually put an indefinite cap on enrollment. And the cumulative effect of all this? The OHP Standard enrollment crashed…big time. In 2002 there were approximately 102,000 people in the program, but by late 2003 (even before enrollment closed) enrollment had declined by 50 percent. Presently, around 19,000 people are covered through OHP Standard, but the program funds can support about 24,000 people.

Read more...