Skip to contentNational Women's Law Center

Danielle Garrett, Health Policy Analyst

Danielle Garrett is a Health Policy Analyst for Health and Reproductive Rights. She has a B.A. from the College of William and Mary in Government and Women’s Studies and a Master of Public Affairs from the University of Texas. She has worked in women’s health and reproductive rights advocacy since college with organizations such as Jane’s Due Process and NARAL Pro-Choice Texas. Danielle enjoys playing guitar, photography, eating seafood, and watching Longhorn football (Hook ‘em!). Once all Americans have access to affordable health care and women’s reproductive rights are secured, she plans to move to the Florida Keys and open a shrimp shack.

My Take

Why Today’s House Vote Could Mean Higher Insurance Premiums

Posted by Danielle Garrett, Health Policy Analyst | Posted on: July 17, 2013 at 02:47 pm

Today, the U.S. House of Representatives is voting to delay the Affordable Care Act’s individual responsibility provision. Coincidentally, this is happening on the same day that the New York Times is reporting that New York’s insurance rates for 2014 are AT LEAST 50% lower than current rates. An individual living in New York City who currently pays $1000 a month for health insurance will see their rate decrease to just $308 a month. And that’s even BEFORE factoring in new federal subsidies that will help individuals cover a portion of their premium costs.

It’s pretty obvious that lower rates are good news for all New Yorkers, particularly women who have a harder time affording health care and are more likely than men to avoid needed health care services because of cost, but this news should also convince the House to vote down the effort to delay the individual responsibility provision.

Read more...

Gene Patenting and Women's Health: What the Myriad Decision Means

Posted by Danielle Garrett, Health Policy Analyst | Posted on: June 20, 2013 at 10:00 am

Last week, the Supreme Court handed down a decision in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, a case dealing with gene patenting. Now, for a lot of people who don't follow the biotech industry closely (or who aren't mega nerds like me who've read every Michael Crichton novel ever published), this seems absurd. "Of course you can't patent genes;" you might say, "Patents are for things that are invented, created, and developed. Genes occur in nature. Isn't that like patenting dirt or a rock or a tree?" But this practice of companies patenting genes they discovered and isolated had been going on for 30 years. This practice means that the companies with patents effectively have a monopoly on research of that gene, stunting other scientists' ability to conduct research and potentially driving up patient costs for tests and treatments related to the research. But then, on June 13th, the Supreme Court agreed, "Of course you can't patent genes! Genes are found in nature." They didn't put it exactly like that, but you get my point. 

So this decision is a triumph of logic and reason, but what exactly does it mean for women's health? The case the Court decided on dealt specifically with Myriad Genetics' long-standing patent on the BRCA 1 and BRCA2 genes. These genes are associated with breast and ovarian cancer, and individuals with certain mutations of this gene are at an increased risk for those types of cancers. The Myriad decision means that more scientists will be able to perform research on these genes, which should lead to breakthroughs in prevention, detection, and treatment.

Read more...

Three Million Reasons to Support Medicaid

Posted by Danielle Garrett, Health Policy Analyst | Posted on: December 10, 2012 at 06:25 pm

I have written many a blog here at the National Women’s Law Center explaining why Medicaid is important to women’s health. Nearly 70% of adults on Medicaid are women and the program provides important benefits to women including family planning services, comprehensive maternity care, treatment for chronic conditions, treatment for breast and cervical cancer, and long-term care services and supports. If you’re a regular reader, you may have even seen my blogs explaining that Medicaid’s cost sharing limits and low or absent premiums are vital to low-income women who have limited disposable incomes to cover their family’s basic needs. 

But today, I’ve got a few new reasons. Three million reasons to be exact. Because three million is the number of women’s health sector jobs that Medicaid spending supports. Every time a Medicaid recipient visits a doctor or hospital, receives a lab test, or is admitted to a nursing home, payments for these services help support the salaries of the employees at these facilities. And most of these employees are women. In fact, women comprise nearly 80% of the health sector workforce.

Read more...

States Not Expanding Medicaid Eligibility is a SCARY Thought

Posted by Danielle Garrett, Health Policy Analyst | Posted on: October 23, 2012 at 03:54 pm

Halloween is just around the corner and I’m pretty psyched about the arrival of haunted houses and scary movie marathons. I’m not easily scared. I will watch The Shining without flinching; I was thrilled about the new season of American Horror Story starting, and one of the first things I do when visiting a new city is look for a good ghost tour. One thing that does have me frightened though (other than the ridiculous lines at Party City the weekend before Halloween) is the prospect that some States may not expand Medicaid eligibility in 2014.

The Affordable Care Act extends health coverage to 30 million currently uninsured Americans through tax credits to purchase private insurance and a major expansion of Medicaid eligibility to all qualified individuals under age 65 who have incomes below 133 percent of the federal poverty line (FPL) (about $30,000 for a family of four). The Medicaid eligibility expansion accounts for approximately half of the coverage gains under the new healthcare law.

Read more...

The Story Behind the Numbers: Health Insurance

Posted by Danielle Garrett, Health Policy Analyst | Posted on: September 11, 2012 at 09:57 am

Tomorrow, the Census Bureau will release new data on poverty, income, and health insurance in the U.S. in 2011. As we get ready to crunch numbers, we thought it would be helpful to take a deeper look at what these numbers will tell us about health insurance.

Where does this data come from?

Every month, the Census Bureau surveys approximately 50,000 households to estimate the unemployment rate. This is known as the Current Population Survey (CPS). Once a year, they supplement these questions with additional questions regarding health coverage and income and survey 78,000 households. This supplement is known as the Annual Social and Economic Supplement (ASEC). The ASEC questions regarding health insurance explore whether each member of the respondent household had insurance coverage throughout the previous calendar year, and if so, what kind of coverage.

There is some lag time between when the data are collected and when they are released. The survey is conducted in March and asks respondents about their insurance coverage over the entire previous year. It then takes several months for the data to be cleaned up and ready to release to the public in September. This means that the data released on Wednesday were collected in March of 2012 and will show insurance coverage at some point during 2011. According to the Census Bureau, the ASEC is the most widely used source of data on health insurance coverage in the U.S.

Read more...