Skip to contentNational Women's Law Center

Devi Rao, Fellow

Devi Rao is a Skadden Fellow for Educational and Employment Opportunities at the National Women's Law Center, where she focuses on using Title IX to promote safe school environments, including preventing gender-based bullying. Devi is a graduate of the University of California, Berkeley and Columbia Law School, where she served as Editor-in-Chief of the Columbia Law Review. Prior to joining NWLC, Devi served as a law clerk to the Honorable M. Margaret McKeown of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. During law school, Devi was a staff member of the Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, served on the board of the Columbia Law Women's Society, and interned at Legal Momentum, a women's rights legal organization. In her summers, Devi interned with the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Northern District of California in the White Collar Section, and worked as a summer associate at Goldstein, Demchak, Baller, Borgen & Dardarian, a civil rights law firm in Oakland, California. She is happy to be back in Washington, D.C., where she lived and worked after college.

My Take

Dear Department of Education and Yale University, thanks for the birthday present. Sincerely, Title IX

Posted by Devi Rao, Fellow | Posted on: June 21, 2012 at 02:26 pm

What do you get a law that has everything? Well, last week, just in time for Title IX’s 40th birthday (this Saturday, June 23), the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) and Yale University decided to go the I-put-a-lot-of-time-into-this-present-because-I-really-care-about-you route: OCR and Yale entered into a resolution agreement to settle a complaint alleging that Yale failed to eliminate sex discrimination on campus in violation of Title IX. Happy birthday, Title IX!

The agreement resolves a March 2011 complaint by a group of 16 current and former Yale students alleging that a sexually hostile environment existed on campus. The complaint pointed to an October 2010 incident in which members of the Delta Kappa Epsilon fraternity chanted “No means yes! Yes means anal!” and other charming bon mots in front of the Yale Women’s Center.

This episode, the complaint claimed, was an example of an ongoing pattern of sexual harassment, to which the university failed to promptly or fairly respond. (No students involved received discipline.) In addition, the complaint alleged that Yale didn’t have a Title IX coordinator, as required by the law, and had an inadequate grievance process for addressing sex discrimination complaints.

Read more...

Senate Hearing Underscores Need for Discrimination Protections for LGBT Workers

Posted by Devi Rao, Fellow | Posted on: June 18, 2012 at 11:32 am

Last week, the Senate HELP Committee (that’s Health, Education, Labor, & Pensions) held a hearing on an important piece of bipartisan legislation, the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), which would provide lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals with long overdue protection against discrimination in the workplace. Specifically, ENDA would prohibit employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity in both public and private employment (with exemption for small businesses and certain religious employers). Although in certain circumstances, LGBT individuals are currently protected from employment discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, there is no federal law that explicitly prohibits workplace discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.

The HELP Committee hearing provided an important opportunity for advocates, scholars, and business executives to explain their support (and in one case, opposition) of ENDA to members of the Senate. It also marked an historic occasion—Kylan Broadus, Founder of the Trans People of Color Coalition, became the first openly transgender person to testify before the Senate, a milestone that Senator Harkin (and the Washington Blade) noted. Broadus spoke movingly about his experiences as a transgender American and with workplace discrimination, and described his transition as “a matter of living the truth and sharing that truth for the first time in [his] life.”

Read more...

Really, GAO? Study Finds Need for More Studies

Posted by Devi Rao, Fellow | Posted on: June 11, 2012 at 10:58 am

Last week, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report on school bullying. Its basic takeaway — indeed, its title — was that the extent of legal protections for vulnerable groups — such as lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) students — needs to be more fully assessed. Sure, federal government, study away. But in the meantime, let’s agree this is a problem, understand that tools are already in place that can help address it, and advocate for increased legal protections.

The GAO report noted a lack of data from federal agency surveys on the prevalence of bullying on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. But it’s not as if the data doesn’t exist. As the report observes, a 2009 study by GLSEN (the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network) found that nearly 9 out of 10 of the LGBT student respondents had been called names or threatened in the past school year on the basis of their sexual orientation, and two out of three on the basis of their gender expression. And just last week, the Human Rights Campaign released a report on its survey of LGBT-identified youth which found that LGBT youth were twice as likely to have been verbally harassed at school as their non-LGBT peers. I could totally go for a federal study or two, but it seems pretty clear already that this is a serious problem.

And although I can get behind the GAO’s criticism of the lack of data on state law protections for LGBT youth, there are federal protections in place that we know about.

Read more...

President Obama Endorses Bills to Protect LGBT Students from Bullying and Harassment

Posted by Devi Rao, Fellow | Posted on: April 23, 2012 at 04:15 pm

On Friday, President Obama officially endorsed two crucial pieces of legislation currently pending in Congress — the Student Non-Discrimination Act (SNDA) and the Safe Schools Improvement Act (SSIA). The bills are aimed at improving the climate in our nation's schools, especially for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) students.

SNDA would outlaw discrimination in K-12 public schools on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity/expression. And the bipartisan SSIA would require schools to undertake affirmative efforts to prevent bullying and harassment in schools, including conduct based on a victim's sexual orientation and gender identity. These bills are essential — a 2009 study by GLSEN (the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network) found that nearly 9 out of 10 LGBT students experienced harassment in schools.

Here at the National Women's Law Center, we have been working actively with our coalition partners to advance SNDA and SSIA. Just last month, NWLC was among a group of seventy LGBT, civil rights, education, labor, and faith groups that sent a letter to President Obama urging him to publicly support and endorse SNDA. And he did!

The Administration's announcement of its support of SDNA and SSIA was timed to coincide with a screening of the new documentary film "Bully" at the White House. I was lucky enough to attend the screening, where Lee Hirsch, the director, and many of the students and families featured in the film spoke poignantly about bullying and harassment in schools, and urged audience members to work to eradicate it.

Read more...

Taking Birth Control Does Not Make You A Slut (And Other Observations)

Posted by Devi Rao, Fellow | Posted on: April 11, 2012 at 05:18 pm

Yesterday the National Women's Law Center hosted a tweetchat with women's health advocate Sandra Fluke and Law Students for Reproductive Justice. The chat provided a great opportunity for university students and employees to learn more about their contraceptive coverage under the health care law and the Obama Administration's proposed accommodation for religiously-affiliated employers.

And although the actual chat conversation was lively and informative, unfortunately a few vocal "participants" attempted to "hijack" (their word) the chat and launch hostile, offensive, and sexist ad hominem attacks on Sandra Fluke and any person who dares to ask his or her school or employer to provide contraceptive coverage. (The worse examples of the comments can be found here.)

So, apparently a woman who advocates for equality in health care exhibits "whorish behavior and a slutty lack of respect." Charming.

Read more...