Skip to contentNational Women's Law Center

Jenny Egan, Fellow

Jenny Egan is the Margaret Fund Fellow at the National Women's Law Center, where she focuses on the advancement of women and girls at school and in the workplace. During law school, Jenny interned with the ACLU Racial Justice Project, the Fair Housing Justice Center, and the South African Human Rights Commission. Prior to law school, Egan worked for the ACLU's National Security Project where she developed and implemented national advocacy campaigns. Jenny is a graduate of Smith College and the University of Michigan Law School.

My Take

New Guidance for School Diversity Efforts

Posted by Jenny Egan, Fellow | Posted on: December 06, 2011 at 04:44 pm

The benefits of racial integration have been demonstrated time and again. At the National Women’s Law Center, we believe that racial integration is not only essential for equality of opportunity and elimination of stereotypes on the basis of race, but that integration benefits women by undermining powerful gender stereotypes.

Unfortunately, as Education Secretary Arne Duncan noted last week, “Racial isolation remains far too common in America’s classrooms today and it is increasing. This denies our children the experiences they need to succeed in a global economy, where employers, coworkers, and customers will be increasingly diverse. It also breeds inequity, which is inconsistent with America’s core values.”

Which is why we were excited that on Friday, the Department of Justice and the Department of Education released joint guidance for how K-12 schools, colleges, and universities can voluntarily consider race to achieve diversity and avoid racial isolation. The guidance is meant to clarify three earlier Supreme Court decisions related to diversity in school (Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger). The new guidance nullifies two earlier guidance letters from 2008 that incorrectly described those court decisions and discouraged school districts from making efforts to diversify their student populations.

Read more...

Education History 101: Flexibility Means Bending Backwards To Avoid Educating Those Most in Need

Posted by Jenny Egan, Fellow | Posted on: November 08, 2011 at 05:19 pm

Today the Senate HELP Committee held a “roundtable” on the proposed Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) that was voted out of committee two weeks ago. The roundtable came about as a result of some procedural wrangling by Sen. Rand Paul, who continues to call for greater “flexibility” for states. Today’s ESEA takeaway came from Wade Henderson, CEO of the Leadership Conference, who once and for all addressed the argument that states should be the absolute arbiters of education reform. Henderson explained that the Supreme Court studied this “states’ rights” approach to public education and “found it deeply wanting and, in fact, offensive to the Constitution.” In short – for years “flexibility” meant that states bent backwards to avoid educating the kids who need it most – including children of color, poor kids, and students with disabilities.

Read more...

20 Years Later They’re Still Attacking Anita Hill

Posted by Jenny Egan, Fellow | Posted on: November 07, 2011 at 03:45 pm

Twenty years ago, Anita Hill sat down in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee and detailed how her former supervisor repeatedly made a series of vulgar advances and regularly turned professional conversations into sex-tinged talk of pornography and physical anatomy. As a result, Professor Hill was eviscerated in the Senate and in the press, where people derided her as humorless, a perjurer and (get ready for the real humdinger) as “a little bit nutty and a little bit slutty.” Anyone who actually watched Professor Hill testify was shocked by the disparity between her manner (cool, collected, humble) and the way she was spoken about in the press (vindictive, disingenuous, trampy). Books were published maligning her good name. One book in particular, The Real Anita Hill, received a substantial amount of press. But when the author’s later recanted and apologized for the copious lies contained in the book, there was much less of an uproar. Anita Hill was asked, on the floor of the United States Senate, if she was simply a “spurned woman” out for revenge. She received death threats and her job was threatened. At the time, Clarence Thomas categorically denied every one of the allegations despite the fact that he did not actually listen to Anita Hill’s testimony.

We know now that there were other women who worked for Thomas that were prepared to testify and corroborate Hill’s story – but the chairman of the committee, then Senator Joe Biden, declined to call any of them to the stand. Other colleagues came forward and offered to testify about Thomas' long-standing interest in pornography, but Biden declined to call them as well. Because the Senate Judiciary Committee refused to call most of the most pertinent witnesses, at the time the country was left with an incomplete picture. But over the years, the image has been filled in and today there is consensus that “virtually all the evidence that has emerged since the hearings corroborates Hill’s version of events.”

But fast forward twenty years and there are now political ads out that imply that Professor Hill’s accusations were nothing more than a smear campaign. No wonder Herman Cain’s accuser says she doesn’t want to come forward because she doesn’t want to be another Anita Hill; it is still not safe for women to publicly make an allegation of sexual harassment.

Read more...

Cross Tabulation Amendment Passes!

Posted by Jenny Egan, Fellow | Posted on: October 20, 2011 at 11:37 am

The Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 2011 (ESEA) markup got back underway today — but not without some more parliamentary maneuvering. Yesterday, Sen. Rand Paul, R-KY, objected to the hearings based on the two hour rule. The hearings were adjourned. The HELP Committee came back bright and early this morning, but Sen. Paul objected again. After a brief pause and some negotiations, Sen. Paul withdrew his objection in exchange for a hearing that will be held before the ESEA bill goes to the Senate floor. Sen. Harkin tentatively scheduled the hearing for November 8.

As soon as the committee came back from the break, Sen. Patty Murray, D-WA, introduced an amendment on cross-tabulation. We at NWLC have been waiting with baited breath for this amendment. It would require states to cross-tabulate their student data according to subgroups. Under the current system, states have to report test results by group (including sex) but don’t have to break the data down further so that communities know what is happening for key subgroups like African American boys or Latina girls.

Read more...

Quel Drama at ESEA Markup

Posted by Jenny Egan, Fellow | Posted on: October 19, 2011 at 03:45 pm

This morning the Senate started marking up the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 2011 (ESEA), but they didn’t get very far. About an hour and a half into the meeting, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) objected to the hearings. Senate rule XXVI (5)(a) says that when the Senate is in session, no committee can meet for more than two hours after the Senate has convened, without special leave. Getting leave to hold a meeting is usually a non-issue — the committee asks for permission on the floor of the Senate, everyone says "aye," and people move on. But not today. Sen. Paul objected and the chairman of the committee, Tom Harkin (D-IA), was forced to adjourn the meeting.

Quel drama.

The Senate rule shenanigans signal that this bill is more contentious than most — and I’m saying that in today’s political climate. The bill was proposed by the Harkin but joined by Sen. Mike Enzi (R-WY). In their opening comments both men lamented that it was not the law either one wanted, but a compromise between both sides. Sen. Harkin said it lacked accountability provisions he would prefer. Sen. Enzi said that the bill still had too many accountability provisions for his taste. The revised bill was only released on Monday, but by Wednesday there were more than 150 amendments to consider (seventy-five of them from Sen. Paul).

Read more...