Skip to contentNational Women's Law Center

Jill C. Morrison, Senior Counsel

Jill C. Morrison is Senior Counsel in Health and Reproductive Rights at the National Women’s Law Center. Since joining the Center in 1998 as a Georgetown Women’s Law and Public Policy Fellow, her focus has been on religious restrictions on reproductive health services. Ms. Morrison is a graduate of Rutgers University and Yale Law School, where she was an editor of the Yale Journal of Law and Feminism and president of the Black Law Students' Association. She served as a judicial clerk to the Honorable Sterling Johnson Jr., Eastern District, New York. Ms. Morrison also practiced in Philadelphia as a Bar Foundation Fellow with the Women’s Law Project, and as an associate with Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll. Ms. Morrison currently serves on the board of the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice, and teaches Reproductive Justice at the University of the District of Columbia Law School.

My Take

Just for the Record: Paying for an Abortion Is Not a Crime

Posted by Jill C. Morrison, Senior Counsel | Posted on: August 17, 2009 at 03:14 pm

by Jill Morrison, Senior Counsel, 
National Women's Law Center 

Read more...

EEOC says Catholic-Affiliated College Must Provide Insurance Coverage for Contraceptives

Posted by Jill C. Morrison, Senior Counsel | Posted on: August 11, 2009 at 07:30 pm

by Jill Morrison, Senior Counsel, 
National Women’s Law Center 

The Charlotte District Office of the EEOC has just ruled that Belmont Abbey College discriminated against women when it removed coverage for contraceptive drugs from its employees’ health insurance plan. Read all about it here.

Read more...

Fear Factor: the Health Reform Edition

Posted by Jill C. Morrison, Senior Counsel | Posted on: August 04, 2009 at 01:04 pm

by Jill Morrison, Senior Counsel, 
National Women's Law Center 

So it seems that there’s a pretty nasty rumor going around about end-of-life care in health reform.  The gist of it is “health care reform will force old, sick people to agree to refuse any health care, and just die.” 

Read more...

The Possible Cause of a Third-Trimester Abortion: A Religiously-Based Refusal to Provide Information

Posted by Jill C. Morrison, Senior Counsel | Posted on: June 05, 2009 at 07:57 pm

by Jill Morrison, Senior Counsel, 
National Women's Law Center

Cross-posted from RH Reality Check.

The assassination of Dr. George Tiller has brought some attention to the issue of abortions that take place late in pregnancy, inspiring many to wonder aloud how often these procedures take place and what contributing factors may leave women in this difficult position.  A myriad of physical and psychological crises give rise to this rare occurrence, but one situation possibly arose because a doctor imposed his religious or moral beliefs on his patient. 

One woman ended up having an abortion in her third trimester because a doctor purposefully withheld information from her about her fetus’s terminal medical condition.  As reported in the Washington Post, a woman discovered only a few weeks before her due date that her fetus had developed without a brain, and would never take one breath.  Dr. LeRoy Carhart, who worked with Tiller, said “Her doctor knew the problem all along but just never told her.”

While the article doesn’t give all the details, the facts suggest that the doctor withheld information because of his opposition to abortion.  He apparently believed that she would terminate her pregnancy if she knew her baby couldn’t survive, and then made a decision, based on his personal religious or moral beliefs, to withhold crucial information about her medical condition.  This is exactly the hypothetical situation we described in our paper, When health care providers refuse: The impact on patients of providers’ religious and moral objections to give medical care, information or referrals.   In a federal case called Grant v. Fairview Hosp., decided in 2006, an ultrasound technician claimed that he had a religiously based need to “counsel” pregnant patients once he found out they were considering abortion.  Fortunately the court held that his employer had a right to protect patients seeking medical care from the employee’s religious harassment.

Read more...