Skip to contentNational Women's Law Center

Julie Vogtman, Senior Counsel

Julie Vogtman is Senior Counsel for the Family Economic Security Program at the National Women’s Law Center. She works on a range of issues involving economic support for low-income women and their families, including minimum wage policies, unemployment benefits, and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). She also contributes to the Center’s work on federal budget and tax policies, including implementation of the tax credit components of the Affordable Care Act.  Prior to joining the Center, Ms. Vogtman was an associate with Covington & Burling LLP in Washington, DC. She is a graduate of Furman University and Georgetown University Law Center.

My Take

States Taking the Lead to Raise the Minimum Wage – But Time Running Out in Connecticut

Posted by Julie Vogtman, Senior Counsel | Posted on: May 07, 2012 at 01:28 pm

I hope you saw the new infographic we posted this morning. I think it makes a pretty clear case for raising the minimum wage! Fortunately, in recent months, quite a few states have been getting the message: legislatures in Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York are all considering bills to increase the state minimum wage, including the minimum wage for tipped workers. And in Missouri, state advocates just delivered 175,000 signatures in support of a voter initiative that would get a minimum wage increase on the ballot in November.

As of today, the bill in Connecticut (H.B. 5291) – which passed the state House of Representatives last month – is closest to being law. At $8.25 per hour, Connecticut’s minimum wage is higher than the federal level ($7.25 per hour), but still leaves a mother with two kids more than $1,000 below the poverty line if she works full time. H.B. 5291 would raise the state minimum wage to $8.75 per hour over two years and raise the minimum cash wage for tipped workers from $5.69 to $6.04 per hour by 2015.

Read more...

Where the Women Are – and Aren’t

Women deserve a raise!

Women deserve a raise!

Some more numbers that underscore the importance for women of raising the minimum wage:

  • Annual earnings for a full-time minimum wage worker: $14,500;
  • Minimum cash wage for tipped workers: $2.13;
  • What the typical woman working full time, year round makes for every dollar paid to her male counterpart: 77 cents.
Read more...

Minority in Senate Blocks Buffett Rule

Posted by Julie Vogtman, Senior Counsel | Posted on: April 17, 2012 at 09:40 am

Happy Tax Day! I realize paying taxes is not something most people relish, but when I have to send a check to Uncle Sam, I try to focus on all of the important services my tax dollars support. And I try not to think about the people who make a whole lot more money than I do but pay a smaller share of their incomes in taxes – like, say, the 22,000 millionaires who paid less than 15 percent of their income in federal taxes in 2009. (Even if you paid only a few dollars in federal income tax, that’s more than the 1,470 households with incomes over $1 million in 2009 who paid zero dollars in federal income tax.)

I know I’m not the only one who believes it’s wrong for some millionaires and billionaires to pay a lower tax rate than many middle-income families pay. Last night, 51 Senators (49 Democrats, 1 Independent and 1 Republican) voted to begin debate on the Paying a Fair Share Act (S. 2230), often referred to as the “Buffett Rule,” which would require households with incomes above $1 million to pay at least a 30 percent income tax rate (with a phase-in for incomes between $1 million and $2 million).

Read more...

Why Women Need a Buffett Rule

Posted by Julie Vogtman, Senior Counsel | Posted on: April 12, 2012 at 03:33 pm

On Monday, the Senate is set to vote on whether to begin debate on the Paying a Fair Share Act (S. 2230) sponsored by Sen. Whitehouse (D-RI). By requiring that all households with incomes above $1 million pay at least a 30 percent tax rate (with a phase-in for incomes between $1 million and $2 million), this bill would implement the tax policy often referred to as the “Buffett Rule” (after Warren Buffett, the billionaire who famously pays a lower effective income tax rate than his secretary). The details of the bill are rather complex, but the principle behind it is simple – and true: millionaires and billionaires shouldn’t be paying a lower tax rate than many middle-income families pay.

So why do I think millionaires aren’t already paying their fair share? And why should women care? I’m glad you asked: 

The rich are getting richer, while the poor are getting poorer.

I’m sure you’ve heard this maxim before, but it’s especially true today.

Read more...

The Rebuild America Act Presents a True Path to Prosperity

Posted by Julie Vogtman, Senior Counsel | Posted on: March 29, 2012 at 02:13 pm

The clock is ticking down to a vote in the House on the FY 2013 budget resolution introduced by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI). The vote is scheduled for this afternoon, and, unfortunately, the budget is expected to pass. As we've explained, the Ryan plan would slash vital services for women and their families while giving trillions in tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans and large corporations. Though Rep. Ryan titled his budget the "Path to Prosperity," it seems clear to me that in his vision, prosperity belongs to the one percent.

Over on the Senate side, however, we can thank Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA) for introducing a bill today that would establish a meaningful path to broadly shared prosperity. Sen. Harkin's Rebuild America Act is nearly as sweeping in scope as the Ryan budget but presents an entirely different — and refreshingly positive — vision for our country's future. Where the Ryan budget would shred supports that low- and middle-income people depend on throughout their lives, the Rebuild America Act would invest in measures to help ordinary Americans obtain good jobs; gain access to quality child care, education and job training; and improve their retirement security. And where the Ryan budget would cut essential programs to pay for huge tax breaks for the rich and corporations, the Rebuild America Act would finance needed investments by raising revenue from those with the greatest ability to pay.

Read more...