Skip to contentNational Women's Law Center

Julie Vogtman, Senior Counsel

Julie Vogtman is Senior Counsel for the Family Economic Security Program at the National Women’s Law Center. She works on a range of issues involving economic support for low-income women and their families, including minimum wage policies, unemployment benefits, and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). She also contributes to the Center’s work on federal budget and tax policies, including implementation of the tax credit components of the Affordable Care Act.  Prior to joining the Center, Ms. Vogtman was an associate with Covington & Burling LLP in Washington, DC. She is a graduate of Furman University and Georgetown University Law Center.

My Take

Where the Women Are – and Aren’t

Women deserve a raise!

Women deserve a raise!

Some more numbers that underscore the importance for women of raising the minimum wage:

  • Annual earnings for a full-time minimum wage worker: $14,500;
  • Minimum cash wage for tipped workers: $2.13;
  • What the typical woman working full time, year round makes for every dollar paid to her male counterpart: 77 cents.
Read more...

Minority in Senate Blocks Buffett Rule

Posted by Julie Vogtman, Senior Counsel | Posted on: April 17, 2012 at 09:40 am

Happy Tax Day! I realize paying taxes is not something most people relish, but when I have to send a check to Uncle Sam, I try to focus on all of the important services my tax dollars support. And I try not to think about the people who make a whole lot more money than I do but pay a smaller share of their incomes in taxes – like, say, the 22,000 millionaires who paid less than 15 percent of their income in federal taxes in 2009. (Even if you paid only a few dollars in federal income tax, that’s more than the 1,470 households with incomes over $1 million in 2009 who paid zero dollars in federal income tax.)

I know I’m not the only one who believes it’s wrong for some millionaires and billionaires to pay a lower tax rate than many middle-income families pay. Last night, 51 Senators (49 Democrats, 1 Independent and 1 Republican) voted to begin debate on the Paying a Fair Share Act (S. 2230), often referred to as the “Buffett Rule,” which would require households with incomes above $1 million to pay at least a 30 percent income tax rate (with a phase-in for incomes between $1 million and $2 million).

Read more...

Why Women Need a Buffett Rule

Posted by Julie Vogtman, Senior Counsel | Posted on: April 12, 2012 at 03:33 pm

On Monday, the Senate is set to vote on whether to begin debate on the Paying a Fair Share Act (S. 2230) sponsored by Sen. Whitehouse (D-RI). By requiring that all households with incomes above $1 million pay at least a 30 percent tax rate (with a phase-in for incomes between $1 million and $2 million), this bill would implement the tax policy often referred to as the “Buffett Rule” (after Warren Buffett, the billionaire who famously pays a lower effective income tax rate than his secretary). The details of the bill are rather complex, but the principle behind it is simple – and true: millionaires and billionaires shouldn’t be paying a lower tax rate than many middle-income families pay.

So why do I think millionaires aren’t already paying their fair share? And why should women care? I’m glad you asked: 

The rich are getting richer, while the poor are getting poorer.

I’m sure you’ve heard this maxim before, but it’s especially true today.

Read more...

The Rebuild America Act Presents a True Path to Prosperity

Posted by Julie Vogtman, Senior Counsel | Posted on: March 29, 2012 at 02:13 pm

The clock is ticking down to a vote in the House on the FY 2013 budget resolution introduced by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI). The vote is scheduled for this afternoon, and, unfortunately, the budget is expected to pass. As we've explained, the Ryan plan would slash vital services for women and their families while giving trillions in tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans and large corporations. Though Rep. Ryan titled his budget the "Path to Prosperity," it seems clear to me that in his vision, prosperity belongs to the one percent.

Over on the Senate side, however, we can thank Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA) for introducing a bill today that would establish a meaningful path to broadly shared prosperity. Sen. Harkin's Rebuild America Act is nearly as sweeping in scope as the Ryan budget but presents an entirely different — and refreshingly positive — vision for our country's future. Where the Ryan budget would shred supports that low- and middle-income people depend on throughout their lives, the Rebuild America Act would invest in measures to help ordinary Americans obtain good jobs; gain access to quality child care, education and job training; and improve their retirement security. And where the Ryan budget would cut essential programs to pay for huge tax breaks for the rich and corporations, the Rebuild America Act would finance needed investments by raising revenue from those with the greatest ability to pay.

Read more...

Alabama Legislators Consider Ways to Cut the Budget – and Increase Poverty for Women and Kids

Posted by Julie Vogtman, Senior Counsel | Posted on: March 22, 2012 at 10:01 am

While Washington begins debate on an FY 2013 budget proposal that would slash federal safety net programs (and everything else), some states facing projected budget shortfalls in FY 2013 have already proposed draconian cuts of their own. Alabama is one of those states, and as Greg Kaufman recently reported in The Nation, the steps Alabama’s legislature takes over the next few months to close its FY 2013 budget gap could be disastrous for struggling women and their families.

For example, at a hearing late last month, a state legislator with a lead role in budget drafting suggested that a 25 percent cut to general fund revenues flowing to the state’s Department of Human Resources (DHR) is likely next year. That’s a huge cut – so huge that the Commissioner of DHR, Nancy Buckner, testified that she would be forced to entirely eliminate the state’s Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) and child support enforcement programs.

Shutting down these programs would be devastating for vulnerable families in Alabama.

Read more...