Skip to contentNational Women's Law Center

Lara S. Kaufmann, Senior Counsel & Director of Education Policy for At-Risk Students

Lara S. Kaufmann is Senior Counsel and Director for Education Policy for At-Risk Students.  She works on the advancement of women and girls at school and in the workplace. Lara engages in litigation, advocacy, and public education, with a particular focus on improving educational outcomes for at-risk girls, including pregnant and parenting students. Lara co-authored the Center’s 2012 report, A Pregnancy Test for Schools: The Impact of Education Laws on Pregnant and Parenting Students, as well as its 2009 report, Listening to Latinas: Barriers to High School Graduation. Before joining the Center, Lara was a Staff Attorney with the Federal Trade Commission’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, and prior to that she was an Assistant United States Attorney in Chicago. Lara also worked with the law firm of McDermott, Will & Emery, and was law clerk to then-Chief Judge Marvin Aspen of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Lara is a graduate of the University of Michigan and Northwestern University School of Law.

My Take

Teen Parents Falling Through the Cracks

by Lara S. Kaufmann, Senior Counsel, 
National Women’s Law Center 

I know, I know – we’re in a recession, the economy is terrible, it’s a tough time for everyone. Still, I try to be hopeful. But then I wake up and see a headline like this one: Program for Teen Parents Dropped: About 100 students in county schools learned skills to help them graduate while caring for their kids.

I’ve heard of this program – it’s called GRADS (Graduation, Reality, and Dual-Role Skills), and the curriculum has been used in a number of states. In the Springfield, Ohio area it serves about 100 students per year – predominantly female, but some are male – and about 25 of them attend the school that is cutting the program. The Ohio Department of Education did a study of the program’s effectiveness, and found that teen parents involved in GRADS are more likely to stay in school, to get early prenatal care, and to increase their knowledge of “positive parenting practices.” They also are less likely to have a second child (critical to dropout prevention) and to deliver low-weight babies. So why was it dropped? Budget cutbacks, of course! It costs $99,000 a year to run the program, and the state reimburses the district for only $33,000 of that. The superintendent explained that the school simply can no longer afford to have the program there. He said that perhaps guidance counselors can work with parenting students instead, and added: “We are looking at if there’s any way at all that the students could be served.” Whoa.

Read more...

Dropouts Need Fair Pay Too!

by Lara S. Kaufmann, Senior Counsel, 
National Women’s Law Center 

Read more...

Back to School or Back in Time?

Posted by Lara S. Kaufmann, Senior Counsel & Director of Education Policy for At-Risk Students | Posted on: September 09, 2008 at 04:00 pm

by Lara S. Kaufmann, Senior Advisor
National Women’s Law Center

This year, for many public school students across the U.S., “Back to School” means something different than it used to. A growing number of students in a wide variety of states all over the country will be in single-gender classrooms, separated from their peers of the opposite sex.

Single-sex public school classes are popping up all over the country (some have estimated that over 500 public schools will have single-sex classrooms this fall), and the number has been growing steadily since 2006. That is when the Department of Education revised longstanding Title IX regulations to make it easier for schools to adopt single-sex programs. Why is that a problem? Because Title IX and the U.S. Constitution contain safeguards to ensure that single-sex programs in public schools serve only carefully defined and non-discriminatory purposes, do not perpetuate stereotypes about the interests, abilities or learning styles of either gender, and do not result in unequal educational opportunities. The permissive 2006 regulations fly in the face of these safeguards. And as we suspected, by all reports, many of the single-sex programs being adopted by public schools today are based on harmful stereotypes and do not provide equality of opportunity for the excluded gender (or for those who want to continue learning in a coeducational setting). 

Proponents of single-sex education are telling schools and parents that separating boys and girls in school will improve their education. But these claims are not supported by the evidence. They rely on extreme and overbroad generalizations about the differences between boys’ and girls’ brains and how they learn – for example, that teachers should smile at girls and look them in the eye, but should not look boys directly in the eye or smile at them; and that boys – but not girls – should be given time limits for academic tasks.  In reality, every individual is different. Scientists say that males and females are more alike than they are different. And all of the focus on separation by gender takes attention and resources away from the school reforms most likely to make a difference, like smaller classes, better teachers, and increased parental involvement.

Read more...