Skip to contentNational Women's Law Center

Leila Abolfazli, Senior Counsel

Leila Abolfazli is Counsel in the Health and Reproductive Rights Program at NWLC. She works on a range of issues involving the protection and expansion of reproductive rights at the federal level. Prior to joining the NWLC, Ms. Abolfazli was a Senior Associate at WilmerHale in Washington, DC. She is a graduate of Emory University and Georgetown University Law Center.

My Take

Title IX Helped Me Find My True Love

Posted by Leila Abolfazli, Senior Counsel | Posted on: February 01, 2012 at 09:30 am

I have loved sports from a very early age. By the time I was ten, I was playing basketball, softball, and gymnastics. But when I got to 7th grade, I found my true love – cross country. A bit of a natural runner, I loved everything about it. I loved the feeling of running through the woods, of slipping on muddy paths, of hearing the encouragement from my teammates as I ran through the finish line.

A lot of people tend to think cross country as a solitary sport; that it’s you running all alone. But it’s not. At least for my cross country life, it was all about the team. We practiced together as a team, stretched together as a team, did silly pranks as a team. And we raced as a team.

Waiting at the start line for the race to begin, I remember my teammates jumping up and down, pumping one another up in order to forget the wracked nerves or our shivering legs exposed to the bitter cold. I remember the guys on the team (whose race started after ours) chanting our school’s sports songs, and us echoing the chants right back at them. I remember that in those rigorous races, you needed that team. You needed those chants.

Read more...

Thank You Roe

Posted by Leila Abolfazli, Senior Counsel | Posted on: January 22, 2012 at 10:00 am

Thank you Roe.

It’s not easy to identify the moment when I became a staunch supporter of reproductive rights. I think it really just seemed quite obvious to me -- women must have to have the right to choose when they will carry pregnancies to term. I think it was so obvious that I never really thought about the world before the right was recognized by the Supreme Court in 1973. I couldn’t imagine a world where a woman had no choice when faced with an unwanted pregnancy. I couldn’t imagine a life without Roe.

Indeed, I was so clueless that I never really got what was going on in that one scene in Dirty Dancing. You know the one, where there is a hurried, distressed discussion of dirty hangers and you are given a quick scary view of the beautifully-blond dancer shaking and sweating. True, I wasn’t even a preteen when I watched the movie for the first (of a hundred) time. But I really never got how forward-looking that whole scene was even if the rest of the movie was a bunch of serious cheese (that I still love to watch).

Not until I watched that scene more recently did I really think of what it was like before Roe. What that scene told us is that women risked their lives when faced with an unwanted pregnancy, the “back alley” abortion scenario. But to think that life before Roe was just about back alley abortions or clandestine abortions, is also to ignore the efforts that led to Roe and what Roe ultimately said about women’s autonomy (even if not explicitly in the opinion). This is not just about abortions. This is about the women’s movement, about giving women more of a role in the world than child bearing and rearing.

Read more...

Challenging Mandatory Sonograms: Because This Really Isn’t About Informed Consent

Posted by Leila Abolfazli, Senior Counsel | Posted on: January 20, 2012 at 04:57 pm

The 92 abortion restrictions passed last year include a law passed in Texas requiring a doctor to show a sonogram to a woman seeking termination, make the fetal heartbeat audible, and give the woman a detailed explanation of the sonogram before the woman can obtain an abortion. These provisions were immediately challenged for several reasons, including as violating the First Amendment and Due Process, and a lower court agreed to stop the provisions from going into effect as it reviewed the constitutionality of the law. Unfortunately, the Fifth Circuit last week dismissed these concerns and decided that the law could go into effect even as the constitutional challenges continue.

In reaching its decision, the Fifth Circuit rejected arguments that the law violated the First Amendment, including that it implicated “compelling ‘ideological’ speech” (which would require a higher standard of review). Although acknowledging that the “statute’s method of delivering this information is direct and powerful,” the court just considered what Texas did as good ole’ informed consent law regulating medical practice. Yet, not every woman is required to listen to the speech, as the statute allows three groups of women to opt out of the sonogram description including a rape victim, a woman pregnant with a “fetus that has an irreversible medical condition or abnormality,” or a minor who obtains an abortion through judicial bypass procedures. If this really was about informed consent and not ideological speech intended to make women feel bad for their decision to terminate, why allow certain women to opt out of hearing the speech?

Read more...

My Resolution for 2012: Push Back on the Dismantling of Reproductive Rights

Posted by Leila Abolfazli, Senior Counsel | Posted on: January 05, 2012 at 04:32 pm

Here’s to a new year.

Arriving at the National Women’s Law Center three months ago, I never anticipated just how sustained and systemic the efforts to dismantle women’s health and reproductive rights had become.  Sure, I had paid attention to the Planned Parenthood defunding fight (which included the “trade” for a ban on DC funding of abortion services and the “this is not meant to be a factual statement” debacle) and had heard about HR 3 and the disgusting “forcible rape” debate. Indeed, it was those events that informed my decision to work on reproductive rights issues full time. But even though I was aware of what was going on, it was only when I became involved with the issues on a daily basis where I gained a whole new perspective on just how far those who oppose reproductive rights are going in order to completely unravel women’s rights. And it got me thinking, if so many bad things can happen in just my three months here, what will 2012 look like?

So in order to be prepared for this year, I decided to give a quick review of my first three months – a recap of the numerous anti-choice measures that cropped up in just the final months of 2011. Because when you lay it all out, you can’t ignore how serious these efforts really are.

In my very first week, the House of Representatives voted on HR 358, which literally would allow women to die at hospitals instead of getting the emergency care they need if it included abortion care. Seriously?

Read more...

DC Abortion Ban – the Easy Thing to “Give”

Posted by Leila Abolfazli, Senior Counsel | Posted on: December 16, 2011 at 05:08 pm

As the House and Senate sort out the final details of the final appropriations bill, it looks like there are not many surprises. Which is both great and bad news.

Read more...