Skip to contentNational Women's Law Center

Liz Watson, Senior Advisor

Liz Watson, Senior Advisor

Liz Watson is Senior Advisor to the Education and Employment Team at the National Women’s Law Center. In her work on the Education and Employment Team, Liz uses legislative advocacy, public education and litigation to promote full and fair opportunities for women and girls in employment and job training. She also works on cross-cutting projects at the Center that advance the interests of women and girls. Before coming to the Center, Liz was Executive Director of the Georgetown Center on Poverty, Inequality and Public Policy where she led public policy initiatives focused on improving policies and programs that address the needs of low-income workers and marginalized girls and young women. Prior to that, she was legislative counsel for Workplace Flexibility 2010 at Georgetown Law, where much of her work focused on developing policy solutions to work-family conflict and its consequences for low-wage workers. She also practiced employment law at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe. Liz began her career as a Skadden Public Interest Law Fellow, working with low-wage workers and women receiving public benefits in New York City. She served as a law clerk to the Honorable Susan Y. Illston of the Northern District of California. Liz is a graduate of Georgetown University Law Center and Carleton College.

My Take

Hours are the new bonus. What does that mean for workers earning the minimum wage?

Posted by Liz Watson, Senior Advisor | Posted on: July 25, 2012 at 04:17 pm

$7.25 an hour. Imagine feeding a family on that. That’s the magic trick low-wage working women – who make up 2/3 of those earning minimum wages or less – have to perform on a daily basis.

As Kate Gallagher Robbins pointed out yesterday, an hourly wage of $7.25 leaves a person working full time year round with just $14,500—or $3000 below the poverty line for a mom with two kids.

But where does that $7.25 an hour leave workers who can’t get a full-time job? Involuntary part-time work is a huge problem for low-wage workers in today’s labor market. BLS data from 2011 (PDF) show that 8.5 million people were in part-time work for economic reasons like slack work, only being able to find a part-time job or seasonal work.

Instead of multiplying $7.25 by 40 hours a week, for these workers the math looks more like $7.25 x 20 or 25 hours (and in many cases, even fewer hours). In other words, workers earning minimum wages in involuntary part-time jobs are hit much harder by the painfully low minimum wage.

Read more...

"Working Maternity Leaves" Aren't the Solution

Posted by Liz Watson, Senior Advisor | Posted on: July 18, 2012 at 12:53 pm

On Monday, the news broke that a pregnant woman is now leading a Fortune 500 company—an important and exciting milestone. Before being appointed CEO of Yahoo this week, Marissa Mayer disclosed her pregnancy to Yahoo’s Board. When she announced her pregnancy publicly on Monday, she praised the Board for its “evolved thinking” in hiring her anyway – that is, for not violating the Pregnancy Discrimination Act.

I’m not so sure following the law is all that praiseworthy, but here’s what made me cringe as I read the otherwise great news of a pregnant woman breaking through the glass ceiling:

Mayer told Forbes, “My maternity leave will be a few weeks long and I’ll work throughout it.”

I’m picturing a phalanx of 24/7 baby nurses, a state-of-the-art high-tech home office located in a spacious and sunny corner of a beautiful nursery, an in-house lactation consultant, a personal chef, and, don’t forget the personal trainer! As the CEO, Mayer will be free to telecommute to her heart’s content, which is not at all the situation for most working women.

Read more...

The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act: What It Means for Low-Wage Working Women

Posted by Liz Watson, Senior Advisor | Posted on: July 12, 2012 at 04:26 pm

Yesterday, the 100th co-sponsor in the House of Representatives, Grace Napolitano (D-CA), signed on in support of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act. The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act would ensure that employers provide pregnant workers with simple accommodations if they need them to safely continue working during pregnancy.

The National Women’s Law Center is grateful to all of the bill’s co-sponsors for supporting this important piece of legislation.

So why is it so important?

To answer that question, today I asked Dr. Maureen Perry-Jenkins what happens to low-wage working women when they can’t get simple accommodations that they need during their pregnancies. Dr. Perry-Jenkins is a researcher at the University of Massachusetts conducting a federally-funded study of low-wage working families across the transition to parenthood.

Here’s her answer: All too often, pregnant low-wage workers wind up out of a job.

It is common for women in Dr. Perry-Jenkins’ studies to report they felt they had no choice other than to quit their physically demanding jobs in those instances when their pregnancies no longer permitted them to stand for long periods of time, lift heavy objects or work very long shifts with no break.

Read more...

Work-Family Conflict: It’s a Structural Problem, Stupid.

Posted by Liz Watson, Senior Advisor | Posted on: June 25, 2012 at 01:11 pm

At its core, Anne-Marie Slaughter’s recent article, “Why Women Still Can’t Have It All,” says this: The way we work cannot stay the same when the composition of our workforce has forever changed.

I’ll add to that: Public policies and voluntary employer practices that reflect the realities of today’s workforce are long overdue.

In the majority of families, both parents go to work and most families depend on both parents’ incomes to stay afloat. If it ever was, this is no longer “just” a women’s issue. Most men and women today have converged on the belief that both sexes can be good workers and good parents. Men are increasingly involved in child care and other tasks at home, although women still do the largest share of this work.

A lot has changed, but too much remains the same. While today’s households are structured radically differently than they were in 1950, the workplace has clung to the 1950’s image of the ideal (male) worker who is always at the employer’s beck and call, and unencumbered by outside demands on his or her time. But that “ideal worker” image is completely at odds with reality for most of the American workforce.

This is a big problem. And it’s not just a problem for Slaughter or a problem for you or me or for women, it’s a problem for all of us. The solutions lie in changing the way that work and society are structured.

So, let’s talk about those solutions: Paid parental leave and paid sick days are absolutely necessary but not sufficient. On a day-to-day basis workers need schedules that are both flexible and predictable, allowing them to get their jobs done, while attending to the realities of everyday life. Of course, quality, affordable child care makes the very short list.

Read more...

Listen to Betty: Pass the Equal Employment Opportunity Restoration Act

Posted by | Posted on: June 21, 2012 at 02:46 pm

One year ago, in Wal-Mart v. Dukes, the Supreme Court, in a deeply divided 5-4 decision, put severe limits on workers' ability to come together to fight workplace discrimination. Yesterday, Betty Dukes, the named plaintiff in that lawsuit, came to Washington to ask Congress to remove the obstacles the Supreme Court placed in the way of ordinary Americans seeking their day in court.

Betty DukesBetty Dukes at the press conference introducing the EEORA

The Equal Employment Opportunity Restoration Act, introduced by Senator Al Franken and Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro, with 22 co-sponsors in the Senate and 38 in the House, would do just that, by creating a new avenue for workers to bring group actions to challenge company-wide discrimination.

Read more...