Skip to contentNational Women's Law Center

Mara Gandal-Powers, Fellow

Mara Gandal-Powers is a Fellow for Health and Reproductive Rights at the National Women's Law Center. She majored in Women's Studies at Bowdoin College and received her law degree from Washington University in St. Louis School of Law. At Washington University, Ms. Gandal-Powers served as co-president of Law Students for Reproductive Justice, public health officer of the Student Health Lawyers Association, and career services liaison for the Public Interest Law Society. She was an associate editor of the Washington University Global Studies Law Review. During law school, Ms. Gandal-Powers was a law clerk for Senator Al Franken on the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology, and the Law. Additionally, she interned for the Children's Health Advocacy Project, a medical-legal partnership between Legal Services of Eastern Missouri and health centers and children’s hospitals in St. Louis, and the National Women’s Law Center. Prior to attending law school, Ms. Gandal-Powers worked for the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs. She currently serves on the Alumnae Board of The Holton-Arms School.

My Take

An Alternative to Fertility Financing: Insurance Coverage of Fertility Treatment

Posted by Mara Gandal-Powers, Fellow | Posted on: February 24, 2012 at 02:50 pm

An article in today’s Wall Street Journal discusses the booming business of “fertility finance,” lenders that specialize in loans for fertility treatments. The article does a good job of illuminating some of the important issues around this industry, including the potential for predatory lending practices and whether doctors should be able to advertise a lender’s services if the doctor has invested in the company. Executives at these companies call them “recession-proof” because couples facing infertility will always want a baby whether the economy is booming or not. From an economic perspective, these companies are merely meeting a demand for access to fertility treatments among individuals who aren’t super-wealthy. I think there is an alternative answer to this demand that the article doesn’t address: insurance coverage of fertility treatments.

Read more...

Can I Get A Witness?

Posted by Mara Gandal-Powers, Fellow | Posted on: February 17, 2012 at 11:28 am

You’ve probably seen the photo by now of the witness panel at yesterday morning’s House hearing entitled “Lines Crossed: Separation of Church & State. Has the Obama Administration Trampled on Freedom of Religion?” What you may not be able to tell immediately by looking at this photo is that there is no witness to represent the House minority viewpoint. What is immediately obvious is that there were no female witnesses on that panel. But, I was there to witness it and I am here to testify.

From the title and from Chairman Issa’s opening statement, you would have thought that this was a hearing on freedom of religion. But from the start, it wasn’t. The Chairman rejected the minority’s witness, Sandra Fluke, a third-year law student at Georgetown University who was going to testify about experiences of students who don’t have contraceptive coverage. Rep. Issa said that he wanted only the most “qualified” clergy and lay people to discuss the issue of religious freedom. Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton and Rep. Carolyn Maloney walked out on the hearing, furious that Chairman Issa wouldn’t allow them to have a witness.

Then, it was time for that all-male panel you’ve seen in the picture to give their opening statements. What did they say? Bishop Lori compared requiring preventive health services, including birth control, to requiring Kosher delis to serve ham sandwiches.

Read more...

Congressional Members’ Statements on Contraceptive Coverage Rule Not Based in Fact

Posted by Mara Gandal-Powers, Fellow | Posted on: February 09, 2012 at 03:56 pm

I used to think that making a statement on the floor of Congress required showing some respect for the venue in which you are speaking, including refraining from making untrue statements. Yesterday, several members of Congress have proven to me, again, that for some of them this just isn’t the case anymore. When speaking on the House floor today, several members claimed that the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive coverage rule would require employers to cover pills that cause abortions. This is simply false. The rule requires coverage of all FDA-approved contraceptive methods. What is an FDA-approved contraceptive method? That’s easy enough to find right here on the FDA website. Pills, patch, IUDs, etc. The members of the House are probably conflating emergency contraception, which is an FDA-approved contraceptive method, with abortion. But as my colleague Jill Morrison pointed out last week, it’s not.

Read more...

Would you let someone make your contraceptive decisions for you? Didn’t think so.

Posted by Mara Gandal-Powers, Fellow | Posted on: February 02, 2012 at 05:47 pm

Last February, the Department of Health and Human Services released an interim final rule stating that student health plans would be treated as individual health insurance plans, meaning that they would have to cover the women’s preventive health services. Let’s translate that out of “legal-ese:” the Department will require student health insurance plans (not student health centers) to cover preventive services for women, such as contraception, screening for sexually transmitted infections, and screening for interpersonal and domestic violence, without co-pays or deductibles.

Read more...

The Holiday Gift You Can’t Return: 92 New Abortion Restrictions

Posted by Mara Gandal-Powers, Fellow | Posted on: January 06, 2012 at 11:04 am

There’s one extra gift you got this holiday season, and I’m willing to bet it wasn’t on your Amazon Wish List: 92 new abortion restrictions enacted by state legislatures. Last year was the worst year for state abortion restrictions ever. The previous high water mark was 34 in 2005.

Read more...