The Unemployment Emergency Continues for Women and Their Families – But Emergency Unemployment Benefits Are About to Expire
Key Facts
|
Though the recession that began in December 2007 officially ended in June 2009, jobs data released for December 2011 by the Bureau of Labor Statistics reveal that the pain continues for millions of jobless workers and their families. The ranks of the long-term unemployed have reached historic levels; as of December, over 5.4 million Americans, almost half of all jobless women and men, had been unemployed for more than six months.[1] While the growth in jobs during the recovery has been slow overall, it has been nearly non-existent for women, who have seen their unemployment increase nationally and have gained just three percent of the jobs added to the economy since the recovery began.[2] Widespread and prolonged unemployment has driven the numbers of women and children in poverty – and extreme poverty – to record levels.[3]
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects that unemployment will remain well above 8.0 percent through at least 2012[4] – but federal emergency unemployment benefits for long-term unemployed workers who have exhausted their state benefits are set to expire at the beginning of March.[5] The grim unemployment picture for women, men and families demonstrates a clear need to renew federal benefits to help the long-term unemployed and boost the economy.
Long-term unemployment is at historic levels for women and men.
- When the recession officially ended in June 2009, the percentage of jobless workers out of work and seeking employment for 27 weeks or more was at 30.1 percent,[6] the highest rate in over 60 years.[7][EJ1] [GRK2] Since then, the percentage has climbed to an astounding 44.7 percent in December 2011. Long-term unemployment among women has risen from 29.3 percent in June 2009 to 45.0 percent in December 2011 – nearly a 16 percentage point increase.[8] Men’s long-term unemployment has increased by nearly 14 percentage points over this period, to 44.5 percent in December 2011.[9]
- Many of the long-term unemployed have been looking for work for much longer than 27 weeks, making continued federal benefits critical for both women and men. For example, during 2011, more than one out of four jobless women (25.5 percent) and jobless men (27.7 percent) were still looking for work after a year of searching.[10]

Women have gained few jobs over the course of the recovery.
- Between June 2009 and December 2011, while the economy added 1.4 million jobs, women gained 43,000 net jobs – just three percent of all net jobs gained.[11]
- Job losses in the public sector, which are continuing, are driving the bleak jobs picture for women. Between June 2009 and December 2011, women lost 377,000 public-sector jobs, 64.4 percent of all the public-sector jobs lost.[12] During the same period, women gained just 420,000 private sector jobs, 21.1 percent of all the private sector job gains.
Unemployment rates for women have risen since 2009 and are especially high for women of color and single mothers.
- The average annual unemployment rate for women rose from 7.5 percent in 2009 to 7.9 percent in 2011, while the average annual unemployment rate for men declined from 9.6 percent in 2009 to 8.7 percent in 2011.[13]
- Black women’s average unemployment rate for 2011 was 13.2 percent. Black women have not experienced another annual average unemployment rate this high in over 25 years.[14]
- Hispanic women’s average unemployment rate in 2011 was 11.1 percent, down only slightly from their 2010 annual average unemployment rate of 11.4 percent, which was their highest in over 25 years.[15]
- The average annual unemployment rate for single mothers in 2011 was 12.4 percent, their highest annual average rate since these figures were first recorded in the 1960s.[16]
Continued emergency unemployment benefits are warranted by persistently high unemployment and long-term unemployment rates.
- On June 30, 2008, with unemployment at 5.6 percent,[17] President Bush signed into law a new Emergency Unemployment Compensation program (known as EUC08) to extend unemployment benefits beyond the maximum 26 weeks generally provided through the standard federal-state unemployment insurance (UI) program. Congress has enacted similar emergency extensions during seven previous economic downturns over the past 50 years.[18] As amended by subsequent legislation, the EUC08 program allows unemployed workers who have exhausted their state benefits to qualify for successive tiers of additional unemployment benefits. An individual may receive up to 20 weeks of tier I benefits; if she remains unemployed after exhausting tier I, she may be eligible for up to 14 weeks of tier II benefits. Tier III provides up to 13 weeks of additional benefits to workers who have exhausted tiers I and II and live in states with a total unemployment rate of at least 6 percent. Recipients who have exhausted the previous tiers and live in states with a total unemployment rate of at least 8.5 percent may qualify for up to six final weeks of benefits under tier IV.
- In addition, most states provide another 13 to 20 weeks of benefits under a separate permanent federal program called Extended Benefits (EB).[19] Historically, states were required to split EB costs evenly with the federal government, and few states chose to participate. However, under the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) and subsequent legislation, Congress authorized full federal funding for EB benefits, which incentivized more qualifying states (those with unemployment rates above 6.5 percent) to take up the optional program.[20]
- During the past 50 years, Congress has not allowed federal emergency unemployment benefits (like EUC08) to expire when the unemployment rate was above 7.2 percent – and the current unemployment rate is 1.3 percentage points higher than that.[21]
Unless Congress extends them, federal unemployment benefit programs will expire in March 2012.
- Unemployed workers who had qualified for a tier I, II, III, or IV EUC08 benefit by the week ending on or before March 6, 2012 (i.e., by March 3, 2012) will be “grandfathered” for their remaining weeks of eligibility for only that specific tier. Those who exhaust state unemployment benefits after March 3, 2012 will not be eligible for EUC08 benefits at all. Federal funding for the EB program is also set to expire in early March, and workers receiving EB will face a hard cut-off of benefits as states terminate their programs.[22]
- If federal unemployment benefits are not renewed for the remainder of 2012, over 3.3 million unemployed workers will lose access to benefits by the beginning of June.[23]
Continuing federal UI benefits helps unemployed workers, their families, and the economy.
- Due in large part to federally funded benefits, UI kept over 3.2 million people (including nearly 900,000 children and over 1.0 million women) from falling out of the middle class and into poverty in 2010.[24]
- Because recipients generally spend UI benefits quickly to meet basic needs, the benefits generate approximately two dollars in GDP growth for every federal dollar invested.[25]
- The Economic Policy Institute estimates that close to half a million jobs will be lost in 2012 if federal UI benefits are not renewed.[26]
Failure to continue federal unemployment benefits while unemployment and long-term unemployment remain painfully high would have devastating consequences for workers, their families, and the economy.
[1] Nat’l Women’s Law Ctr. calculations from U.S. Dep’t of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) from the Current Population Survey (CPS), Table A-36: Unemployed persons by age, sex, race, Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, marital status, and duration of unemployment, not seasonally adjusted, http://www.bls.gov/web/empsit/cpseea36.htm (last visited Jan. 6, 2012) [hereinafter BLS Table A-36 (2011)]. Number of long-term unemployed for all individuals 16 and older. Percentages of long-term unemployed men and women calculated for workers 20 and older. See also Nat’l Women’s Law Ctr., Modest Recovery Largely Leaves Women Behind (2012), http://www.nwlc.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/slowrecoveryfactsheetjanuary2012.pdf.
[2] Nat’l Women’s Law Ctr., Modest Recovery Largely Leaves Women Behind, supra note 1.
[3] Nat’l Women’s Law Ctr., Poverty Among Women and Families, 2000-2010: Extreme Poverty Reaches Record Levels as Congress Faces Critical Choices (2011), http://www.nwlc.org/sites/default/files/povertyamongwomenandfamilies2010final.pdf.
[4] See Cong. Budget Office, The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2012 to 2022 xv, 27, 35 (January 2012), http://cbo.gov/ftpdocs/126xx/doc12699/01-31-2012_Outlook.pdf.
[5] Temporary Payroll Tax Cut Continuation Act of 2011, Pub. L. No. 112-78, §201 (2011).
[6] Nat’l Women’s Law Ctr. calculations from U.S. Dep’t of Labor, BLS, Table A-36: Unemployed persons by age, sex, race, Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, marital status, and duration of unemployment, not seasonally adjusted, June 2009, 56 Emp. & Earnings No. 7, at 46 (2009), http://www.bls.gov/opub/ee/empearn200907.pdf [hereinafter BLS Table A-36 (2009)] and Nat’l Women’s Law Ctr. calculations from BLS Table A-36 (2011), supra note 1. Rate is for individuals 20 and older.
[7] See Gerald Mayer & Linda Levine, Cong. Research Serv., Long-Term Unemployment and Recessions 3 (2010). This record is for individuals 16 and older.
[8] Nat’l Women’s Law Ctr. calculations from BLS Table A-36 (2009), supra note 6, and BLS Table A-36 (2011), supra note 1.
[9] Nat’l Women’s Law Ctr., Modest Recovery Largely Leaves Women Behind, supra note 1.
[10] Nat’l Women’s Law Ctr. calculations from U.S. Dep’t. of Labor, BLS from the CPS. . Figures are for individuals 20 and older.
[11] Nat’l Women’s Law Ctr., Modest Recovery Largely Leaves Women Behind, supra note 1.
[12] Id.
[13] Average annual unemployment rates for women, white women, Asian women, black women, Hispanic women, and women who maintain families (single mothers) were higher in 2011 than in 2009, while black men were the only subgroup of men to see an increase in their average unemployment rate between 2009 and 2011 (rates for men who maintain families are not available). Nat’l Women’s Law Ctr. calculations from U.S. Dep’t of Labor, BLS from the CPS, Table A-1: Employment status of the civilian population by sex and age [hereinafter BLS Table A-1], Table A-2: Employment status of the civilian population by race, sex, and age [hereinafter BLS Table A-2], Table A-3: Employment status of the Hispanic or Latino population, sex, and age [hereinafter BLS Table A-3], and Table A-10: Selected unemployment indicators [hereinafter BLS Table A-10], available at http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsatabs.htm (last visited Jan. 6, 2012). Rates for women are for individuals 20 and older with the exception of women who maintain families, who are 16 and older. Rates for Asian women, not discussed in the text, are based on Nat’l Women’s Law Ctr. calculations from U.S. Dep’t of Labor, BLS from the CPS database, http://data.bls.gov/pdq/querytool.jsp?survey=ln (last visited Jan. 24, 2012).
[14] Nat’l Women’s Law Ctr. calculations from BLS Table A-2, supra note 13.
[15] Nat’l Women’s Law Ctr. calculations from BLS Table A-3, supra note 13.
[16] Nat’l Women’s Law Ctr. calculations from BLS Table A-10, supra note 13. The annual average unemployment rate for women who maintain families was first recorded in 1968.
[17] Nat’l Women’s Law Ctr. calculations from U.S. Dep’t of Labor, BLS Table A-1, supra note 13.
[18] Katelin P. Isaacs & Julie M. Whittaker, Cong. Research Serv., Unemployment Insurance: Legislative Issues in the 112th Congress 2 (2011).
[19] States may determine whether EUC08 or EB is paid to beneficiaries first; all states currently pay EUC08 benefits before EB benefits. Id. at 3, note 11. EB benefits based on work in state and local government employment are considered “non-shareable” and are financed by the former employers, not the federal government. Id. at 4.
[20] Nat’l Employment Law Project, Hanging on by a Thread 3 (2011), http://www.nelp.org/page/-/UI/2011/NELP_UI_Extension_Report_2011.pdf?nocdn=1.
[21] Id. at 6.
[22]See Katelin P. Isaacs, Cong. Res. Serv., Expiring Unemployment Insurance Provisions 4 (2011). Some states have already begun to trigger “off” the EB program because of state law or because unemployment in the state, while high, has not increased in the three-year “look-back” period used by a majority of states under the current EB formula. The optional three-year look-back provision is set to expire and revert to a mandatory two-year look-back February 29, 2012. See id. at 2-4 (explanation of EB trigger/look-back provisions); see also U.S. Dep’t of Labor, Employment & Training Admin., Recent and Prospective Changes to State EB and EUC Trigger Status as of December 25, 2011, http://ows.doleta.gov/unemploy/claims_arch.asp and Trigger Notice No. 2011-53, State Extended Benefit (EB) Indicators Under P.L. 111-312 Effective Jan. 15, 2012, http://ows.doleta.gov/unemploy/trigger/2012/trig_011512.html (last visited Jan. 20, 2012).
[23] Staff of J. Econ. Comm., 112th Cong., How Continuing the Payroll Tax Cut and Federal UI Benefits Will Help American Families and Support the Recovery 3-4 (2012), http://jec.senate.gov/public/?a=Files.Serve&File_id=67963e37-3cbc-4f1d-a37f-4a42c4f834e3.
[24] Nat’l Women’s Law Ctr. calculations from U.S. Census Bureau, CPS, Table Creator II, http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/cpstc/apm/cpstc_altpov.html (last visited Nov. 7, 2011). Figure includes all types of unemployment benefits.
[25] Wayne Vroman, Urban Institute & IMPAQ Int’l, The Role of Unemployment Insurance as an Automatic Stabilizer During a Recession iv (2010), http://wdr.doleta.gov/research/FullText_Documents/ETAOP2010-10.pdf.
[26] Heidi Shierholz & Lawrence Mishel, Econ. Policy Inst., Labor Market Will Lose Over Half a Million Jobs if UI Extensions Expire in 2012 2 (2011), http://www.epi.org/files/2011/ib318.pdf. The initial EPI estimate considered the effect of federal UI benefits expiring at the end of 2011 for all of 2012.
Search Our Resources
How You Can Help
Sign Up for Email Updates
Marcia Greenberger to Receive Award
NWLC Co-President Marcia Greenberger has been chosen to receive the 2012 Margaret Brent Women Lawyers of Achievement Award at American Bar Association's annual meeting on Aug. 5 in Chicago. The award honors outstanding women lawyers who have achieved professional excellence and paved the way to success for others, and previous winners include Supreme Court Justices Sandra Day O'Connor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg.



