In July, the National Women’s Law Center (and co-counsel B. Lane Hasler) filed a Title IX complaint against Logan College of Chiropractic University Programs in St. Louis for maintaining an attendance policy that treats pregnancy-related absences as unexcused and for discriminating against pregnant student Brandi Kostal. Today, we settled the case, with Logan agreeing to take important steps to ensure that this type of discrimination does not happen again.
Title IX protects against sex discrimination in education, and pregnancy discrimination is sex discrimination. The law guarantees that schools must give all students who might be, are, or have been pregnant the same access to school programs and extracurricular activities that other students have. This means that schools must excuse absences for as long as the student’s doctor says is necessary, and must let the student make up the work missed while out. These rules apply to all schools that receive federal funds—including colleges whose students get federal financial aid. In June, the Department of Education issued guidance on Title IX’s application to schools’ treatment of pregnant and parenting students, which reaffirmed that students who miss classes, clinic hours, or any other educational programs due to pregnancy and related conditions cannot be penalized and must be given the opportunity to make up work they miss. The law is clear, but many schools do not adopt policies or practices consistent with their obligations under Title IX. Read more »
Organizations around the country are setting today aside to have a focused conversation about education. The National Day of Action to Reclaim the Promise of Public Education comes in response to recent school closings, reduced funding, and other cuts that are affecting public education across the United States.
For the National Women’s Law Center, bringing attention to the shortfalls of the education system is important because there’s a lot at stake for at-risk girls, women and families, and their communities. Here are some important reminders why it’s important to #ReclaimPublicEd.
When I was a little girl, it was not very popular for Black girls to wear their hair in natural styles. Cornrows were cool, but if you were a Black girl growing up in the 80’s and 90’s, straight hair was one of the requirements for being considered beautiful. Or at least that’s what it felt like to me, based on the images I saw during that time; beauty queens, Barbie dolls, and cover girls (with the exception of Essence and Ebony Magazines) rarely had kinky curls. If you have a relaxer in 2013, you are in the minority (or at least it seems like it) – which is why I was baffled by the contents of a Baltimore Sun story I read today about a young girl named Danielle Cook.
Danielle is a 13-year-old honor student who attends Afya Public Charter School – and wants to attend a top high school. A straight-A student her entire academic life, Danielle thought she had a lot of options. Unfortunately, she found out that while she could apply to the private Cristo Rey Jesuit High School, she would not be able to attend because of her hair. Danielle has had dreadlocks since she was nine years old – a choice all her own, according to her mother – and in order to enroll Cristo Rey she would have to get rid of them.
The good news is that a spokesperson for Cristo Rey told the Baltimore Sun that the policy is no longer in place, and that the school embraces its student’s diversity – racial, religious, and ethnic. Although the school claimed that “no student has declined our offer because of any standards related to the dress code,” changing their policy was the right thing to do. Read more »
After leaving a homecoming dance, a high school girl was brutally raped. Other students photographed the rape but never reported it to police or school officials. Other girls in the school said they felt unsafe and avoided school activities. An employee at the school watched female students change clothes in the bathroom and inappropriately touched them. He was merely reprimanded and allowed to serve as the assistant girls’ basketball coach the next year. Middle school students in the district routinely faced physical and verbal harassment in front of teachers--including grabbing of breasts and genitals and calling male students “faggot” if they weren’t stereotypically masculine. The teachers often failed to report the harassment, let alone address it.
Yesterday a Kansas school suspended a 13-year old student for wearing a purse. Happened to be a Vera Bradley bag, but that shouldn’t matter, because it wasn’t the bright colors or quilted paisley design that prompted the disciplinary action. It was the fact that the student is a boy. There is no school rule about wearing purses, and female students who do so are not punished. But widely held, stubborn stereotypes are that females carry purses and men don’t. This boy, Skylar, defied that stereotype, and his school wouldn’t tolerate it. Read more »
What did you do with your daylight savings extra hour on Sunday?
I watched “Girls,” the first segment of a two-part PBS documentary called “The Graduates.” The documentary explores challenges in education today through the eyes of six Latino students from across the United States. The second segment, “Boys” aired Monday night on PBS. The first segment, which aired last week, told the story of three Latinas; the obstacles they faced and the barriers they have overcome.
Stephanie Alvarado is the daughter of Salvadoran immigrants. Her parents moved to the U.S. to escape civil war violence in El Salvador, and were met with violence on the South Side of Chicago. Stephanie fought through the distractions, became accustomed to the metal detectors at school, and is now a good student, outspoken activist, and community volunteer. Read more »
Ever since the Trayvon Martin shooting, people across the country have engaged in an important dialogue about the challenges faced by African American boys and young men in this country, and rightly so. A focus on – and substantial investment in – the success of males of color in this country is critical and long overdue.
But as the National Women’s Law Center has said time and again, there has been very little attention to the barriers to education that girls and young women of color face, which should not be underestimated in terms of their gravity or their impact. I saw only one piece after the verdict, the Washington Post’s‘Bolster’ black boys, but don’t forget about black girls (and quoting President Obama’s remarks) pointing out that the important focus on African American boys does not have to be at the exclusion of African American girls, who face very real – but sometimes different – obstacles in education, the juvenile justice system, and beyond.
When the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) was signed into law by Lyndon B. Johnson in 1965, its goal was to enhance educational opportunities for disadvantaged children. As Senator Tom Harkin, Chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee, asserted in an Education Week blog last month, ESEA was meant to help lift children out of poverty by making high-quality education accessible to all.
That is still the goal today. And while the 2001 reauthorization of the law, also known as No Child Left Behind, was well intentioned and helped expose the stark disparities in our education system, leaders from both parties acknowledge that the law needs improvement. Republicans and Democrats in the both the House and the Senate have come up with their own revised versions of ESEA this summer (New America’s blog put out a helpful side by side comparison here [PFD]).
Today, the House will begin debate on the so-called “Student Success Act” (SSA), the version of ESEA reauthorization proposed by John Kline, chairman of the Education and Workforce Committee. Despite the clever title, the bill is a giant step in the wrong direction for students. Read more »
The best thing about the last week of the Supreme Court's term is that the waiting ends and we can move from predictions (gloomy or otherwise) to analysis.
Here's the bottomline from the much anticipated Fisher v. UT Austin decision — affirmative action in higher education can and should continue (please see our amicus brief for a whole host of reasons why). This is one of those decisions that deserves a close read — I've now done so and have included five key points from the decision that should not go unnoticed.
Grutter was not overturned. In fact, the Supreme Court followed the decision in Grutter v. Bollinger, that an admissions policy that carefully considers racial and ethnic diversity as one of many factors is constitutional.
The Court acknowledged the importance of diversity to institutions of higher education. The Court reiterated that it defers to a university's judgment that such diversity is essential to the educational mission. As the Court explained, a diverse student body "serves values beyond race alone, including enhanced classroom dialogue and the lessening of racial isolation and stereotypes."
Yesterday, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee debated Senator Harkins’ reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), which included an amendment to add the High School Data Transparency Act to the ESEA. The amendment would require high schools to publicly report data on how many girls and boys are playing sports and how much money schools are spending on their teams. Read more »