When the expiration of federal emergency unemployment insurance (UI) started making front-page news in December, the number of people set to run out of benefits immediately was astounding: 1.3 million people.
Today – just a few weeks into the New Year – we’re at 1.6 million. And that number is only going to grow unless Congress acts.
We’ve been telling you just how critical these benefits are to Americans who have lost their jobs through no fault of their own. While the economy struggles to recover, jobs remain hard to come by – currently, job seekers outnumber job openings by almost three to one. Particularly hard hit are the nearly 3.9 million Americans who are long-term unemployed, meaning they have been searching for work for more than six months. The rate of long-term unemployment remains at historically high levels, and while workers previously were able to rely on federal unemployment benefits when their state benefits ended, the federal program’s December expiration has left many workers out in the cold. Read more »
It’s been a dismal week for unemployed Americans and their families. On Tuesday, Republican senators blocked bills that would have renewed the federal emergency unemployment insurance program, which expired on December 28. Since then, over 1.5 million long-term unemployed workers have lost a crucial source of income – and that number continues to grow as 72,000 people lose access to benefits each week.
Fortunately, many are determined to turn Congress around. Yesterday, I had the privilege of attending a press event on unemployment insurance in the Senate, where I listened to gut-wrenching stories from a group comprised of members of Congress, unemployed citizens and activists. Senator Jack Reed’s opening words captured the afternoon’s tone: “We should not be here. We should be on the floor to extend unemployment insurance.” Read more »
Final passage of the bill, however, is still far from assured. Amendments will be considered in the Senate that could undermine the bill by, for example, requiring jobless workers to meet burdensome new conditions to continue receiving benefits. Some Senators will likely propose offsetting the cost of the bill with cuts to other programs that low-income families depend on. And the bill will still need to garner 60 votes to pass in the Senate, then pass the House, before it can reach the President’s desk. Read more »
It’s the first Monday in 2014. I’ve taken down the decorations, put away the gifts, and made my resolutions – but the surest sign that the holidays are officially over is that Members of Congress are returning from recess. And that’s a good thing, because they have a lot of work to do.
Senate Budget Committee Chairman Patty Murray (D-WA) and House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) – who have been leading a new round of budget negotiations – have announced that they reached agreement on federal government spending levels for the remainder of fiscal year (FY) 2014 as well as FY 2015. Given Congress’s propensity toward last-minute bargains in recent years, you may be a bit surprised that the announcement from Sen. Murray and Rep. Ryan came a couple of days before their self-imposed deadline of December 13, and just over a month before current FY 2014 funding runs out on January 15. But there remains a lot more work to be done to ensure that we don’t face another government shutdown in January – and to make sure low-income women and their families are protected and unemployed workers aren’t left behind.
The budget savings in the bill total approximately $85 billion altogether, with about $22 billion to be used for deficit reduction in addition to the $62 to $63 billion intended to replace sequestration cuts. Major sources of the proposed savings include higher security fees for air travelers and cuts to pension benefits for military retirees and new federal government employees.
Today the Bureau of Labor Statistics released data on unemployment and job growth for November. Here are the key take away points from NWLC’s analysis:
Despite a month of strong growth, low-wage jobs were disproportionately filled by women:
In November, women’s strongest job gains were in education and health (+39,000), professional and business services (which includes the low-wage temporary help services sector) (+17,000), and retail (+15,600).
Men’s strongest job gains were in transportation and warehousing (+26,700), professional and business (+18,000), and manufacturing (+17,000).
In November, 24 percent of women’s job gains were in the low-wage sectors of retail and leisure & hospitality. Only 15 percent of men’s gains came in these two sectors. (Gender data on the temporary help services sector are not yet available for November).
Counting down to the New Year is all about hope, celebration, and a fresh start – for most of us, anyway. This year, the clock is also ticking on federal emergency unemployment benefits, which are set to expire at the end of December. For families relying on these benefits, which supplement state unemployment insurance programs, the New Year is a very scary prospect. Read more »
I believe that To Do lists are an art form. There’s nothing more beautiful than a list of things you need to get done with every single item crossed off of it. Crossing off an action item gives me such a sense of accomplishment that I usually put things I’ve already done on the list, just to cross them off.
In a major speech yesterday about economic mobility, President Obama shared one of his To Do lists with us. The items on this list are much more important than the ones on my usual lists. These items are the legislative and administrative priorities that will help fix the growing problem of income inequality in the United States.
Before sharing his “roadmap” with us, the President started with a reality check. He was blunt about the fact that our economy has become profoundly unequal and families have become more insecure. He drove home the point that we are living in a country that once promised success for those who worked hard, but is now faced with rapidly rising inequality and decreasing upward mobility in a way that “challenges the essence of who we are as a people.” Each fall NWLC analyzes the poverty data put out by the Census bureau, and those sobering statistics illustrate exactly what the President is talking about. I couldn’t agree more with the President when he said that these trends are bad for families, bad for the economy, bad for social cohesion, and bad for democracy. Read more »
U.S. levels of long-term unemployment – workers who have been looking for work for more than 26 weeks – remain at historic levels. The federal emergency unemployment insurance (UI) program, which supplements state unemployment benefits, is set to expire in just over a month. In the past 40 years, Congress has not allowed federal emergency UI benefits to expire when the share of jobless workers who were long-term unemployed was above 23.1 percent. Currently, 36.1 percent, or 4.1 million Americans, are still looking for work after six months of searching.
If the federal emergency unemployment insurance program is not renewed, 2 million workers will lose their benefits in late December or run out of benefits in early 2014. NWLC’s new analysis on the importance of federal emergency UI benefits for women and their families shows that this expiration – which would be damaging to struggling families and bad for the economy – would be also be unprecedented.
There’s a lot of information packed into this chart. Here are three key takeaways: Read more »
In 2012, Social Security kept 12.1 million women and 1 million children out of poverty.
This new statistic can be calculated based on data released today by the Census Bureau. Also part of the release of new data is a report on the supplemental poverty measure (SPM) which takes into account the impact of public programs, as well as medical out-of-pocket and other expenses on families’ economic security. For more about poverty measurement, see our FAQ.
This past September, the Census Bureau released the official poverty numbers for 2012, which showed that women’s poverty remained historically high, with 17.8 million women (14.5 percent) in poverty. Our report detailed what the numbers looked like and the trends over time. But what we didn’t get to see in that data was how many people’s incomes were pulled above the poverty line by specific public programs, some of which are counted in the official poverty measure and some of which aren’t. Today, we can delve deeper into how many people were lifted out of poverty by these programs and who they were. Read more »